Skip to main content

Security report for 365.be

Attractions et Tourisme asbl · Hospitality · Belgium

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

365.be is an official tourism promotion website for the Wallonia and Brussels regions in Belgium, operated by Attractions et Tourisme asbl. It provides comprehensive information on approximately 250 tourist attractions, museums, events, and leisure activities targeting families, tourists, and culture enthusiasts. The site is well-structured with clear navigation, multilingual support, and interactive features such as maps and downloadable guides. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including React components, Matomo analytics, and polyfills for compatibility, delivering a mobile-optimized and accessible user experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though it lacks explicit security policies and incident response contacts. The WHOIS data is restricted by the DNS Belgium registry, but the domain and website content align with legitimate regional tourism promotion. Overall, the site demonstrates a good balance of content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance, making it a trustworthy resource for visitors.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 365.be

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention 365.be, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for 365.be.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate 365.be and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
16
Registered
16
Resolving
16
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • 36•••.beMediumbitsquatting
  • 26•••.beMediumbitsquatting
  • 34•••.beMediumbitsquatting

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of 365.be with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a key regional tourism information portal backed by official Belgian tourism authorities, targeting a broad audience including families and culture lovers. Its business model focuses on promoting local attractions and events to increase tourism engagement. The presence of partner links to Belgian train services and a dedicated mobile app indicates a strategic ecosystem approach. The site’s content and services suggest a medium-sized operation with a focus on digital engagement and user convenience. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for managed contact via forms, typical for public or non-profit organizations. The site’s branding is consistent and professional, reinforcing its official status and trustworthiness in the tourism sector.

Security posture

The website maintains a solid security posture with HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent banner supporting GDPR compliance. The use of Matomo analytics indicates a privacy-conscious approach to user tracking. However, the absence of visible security headers and a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness for security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS data is privacy-protected, which is common and justified for this type of organization. To enhance security maturity, the site should consider publishing a security policy, incident response information, and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information or a security@ email address.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Add HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Enhance transparency by listing data retention policies related to analytics and cookies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Attractions et Tourisme asbl
Description
This website offers a preview of tourist attractions and museums in Wallonia and Brussels, featuring around 250 official sites for family touring, including theme parks, animal parks, caves, railbike rides, recreational estates, water attractions, adventure parks, museums, historic sites, castles, and citadels.
Key services
Tourist attraction listings, Event information, Downloadable guides, Interactive maps, Mobile app
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo Analytics, Polyfill.io, YouTube Player API, CSS with Emotion, Custom JavaScript bundles
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No signs of WAF or blocking
  3. WHOIS data is restricted by DNS Belgium policy
  4. Strong focus on tourism promotion for Wallonia and Brussels
  5. Good privacy and cookie compliance
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, only contact form
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  8. Use of Matomo analytics with cookie consent
  9. Mobile friendly and accessible design
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern front-end stack with React-based components, polyfills for browser compatibility, and Matomo for analytics. It uses asynchronous loading for scripts to optimize performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Hosting details are not explicitly found, but the use of CDN services for scripts and images suggests a distributed content delivery approach. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and caching strategies. No CMS was explicitly detected, indicating a custom or proprietary platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 365.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 365.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.