Skip to main content

Security report for 360fwd.com

360 FWD Ltd · Healthcare · United Kingdom

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

360 FWD Ltd is a UK-based specialist consultancy focused on continuous sustainable improvement in health and educational sectors, emphasizing person-centred care culture transformation through its proprietary 360 Standard Framework. The company offers audit, training, consultancy, and accreditation services aimed at improving care quality and organizational culture. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear contact information and trust signals such as expert testimonials and privacy policies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins and frameworks, delivering moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, though lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, but the overall business presentation is credible and professional.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 360fwd.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
68
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche market serving healthcare providers, educational institutions, and charities with consultancy and training services focused on quality improvement and person-centred care. Its business model revolves around delivering a quality improvement framework and accreditation system that supports sustainable culture change. The presence of expert endorsements and a clear service offering positions 360 FWD as a trusted specialist in its sector. The company targets medium to small organizations seeking to enhance care quality and compliance. The website's content and structure support lead generation and client engagement through contact forms and clear calls to action. No direct revenue streams or e-commerce functionalities are evident, indicating a service-based consultancy model.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. A cookie consent banner is present, indicating some level of privacy compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could be a gap in transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security score is good but could be improved with additional hardening and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add essential security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance GDPR compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing explicit DPO contact information.
  5. Consider verifying and publishing WHOIS data or using a trusted registrar to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
360 FWD Ltd
Description
360 Forward is a specialist consultancy service focused on continuous sustainable improvement in health and educational providers, emphasizing person-centred care culture transformation through the 360 Standard Framework. It offers audit, training, consultancy, and quality improvement systems to health, care, schools, and charities.
Key services
Consultancy, Training, Audit services, 360 Standard Framework accreditation, Diagnostic assessment tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Slider Revolution, Google reCAPTCHA, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL and includes privacy and cookie policies.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone and email.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published.
  6. The site uses common WordPress plugins and technologies with moderate performance.
  7. Content is focused on healthcare and education consultancy with strong emphasis on person-centred care.
  8. Testimonials from recognized experts add trust signals.
  9. No advertising or tracking beyond Google reCAPTCHA detected.
  10. No adult or questionable content present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using WPBakery Page Builder, Bootstrap, jQuery, and Slider Revolution, indicating a modern but common CMS infrastructure. It uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources from its own domain and trusted external sources like Google APIs. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data are properly implemented. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No advanced hosting or CDN information is available from the data. Overall, the technical stack is standard for a small consultancy website with room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 360fwd.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 360fwd.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.