Skip to main content

Security report for 2buy2.com

2buy2 Limited · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

2buy2 Limited is a business specializing in procurement and energy solutions, offering services such as transformative and operational procurement, energy brokerage, and bespoke retainers. Established in 2006, the company targets organizations seeking to optimize procurement processes and energy management to achieve cost savings and compliance. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and related plugins, indicating a modern and maintainable technical infrastructure. While the site is professionally designed and SEO-optimized, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts privacy compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Tracking technologies include Google Analytics and VBOUT marketing automation, reflecting moderate user tracking. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional business presence with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 2buy2.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector with a focus on procurement services, targeting medium-sized organizations. Its business model includes monthly subscription packages and bespoke retainers, positioning it as a service provider that supports procurement maturity and energy cost management. The presence of client logos and case studies suggests an established client base and market presence. The website's content and structure support clear communication of services and value propositions, aiding customer acquisition and retention. However, the absence of detailed contact information and compliance documentation may limit trust for some prospects. The company leverages marketing automation and analytics tools to support growth and engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and registrar domain locks, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Tracking scripts are present but no explicit cookie consent mechanism or privacy policy is found, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Include clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and customer support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
2buy2 Limited
Description
2buy2 helps transform procurement and energy solutions leading to cost savings, compliance, and peace of mind.
Key services
Transformative Procurement, Operational Procurement, Energy Solutions, Buying Solutions, Bespoke Retainers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Jet Plugins, jQuery, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, VBOUT
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
VBOUT tracker
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, VBOUT Marketing Automation
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and structured content.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage or main navigation.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. Uses modern WordPress ecosystem with Elementor and Jet plugins.
  5. Tracking scripts for Google Analytics and VBOUT marketing automation present.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  8. Domain is secured with HTTPS and has registrar lock statuses.
  9. Content is business-focused on procurement and energy solutions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder and Jet plugins, indicating a modern and flexible CMS platform. It uses jQuery and integrates Google Tag Manager and VBOUT for analytics and marketing automation. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed via Cloudflare, which may provide CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and webpage metadata, enhancing search engine understanding. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were identified in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 2buy2.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 2buy2.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.