Skip to main content

Security report for 265health.com

Healthcare · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website '毎日の健康' (Everyday Health) provides daily health-related content in Japanese, covering nutrition, mental health, family health, alternative medicine, dental health, cancer, and public health safety. It serves as an informational resource targeting a general audience interested in health and wellness. The business model appears to be content-driven without direct e-commerce or service offerings. The site links to multiple partner health-related domains, indicating a network of related health information sites. Technically, the website uses basic HTML and CSS with no detected advanced frameworks or CMS. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear navigation structure. However, there is no evidence of modern security headers or HTTPS enforcement from the provided data, which is a concern. No analytics or advertising scripts were detected, suggesting minimal tracking or marketing tools. From a security perspective, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises legitimacy concerns. The lack of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies further reduces compliance posture. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting transparency. The site content is safe and appropriate for general audiences with no adult or explicit material detected. Overall, the website is functional and content-rich but lacks critical security, privacy, and legitimacy indicators. Strategic improvements in domain registration transparency, security headers, HTTPS enforcement, and privacy compliance are recommended to enhance trust and protect users.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 265health.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the healthcare information sector, targeting Japanese-speaking users seeking health advice and information. It leverages a content aggregation model with multiple health categories and partner sites, suggesting a networked approach to health content dissemination. The absence of direct business contact details or company information limits insight into revenue streams or organizational structure. The site likely relies on organic traffic and partnerships for visibility. Growth potential exists if compliance and security are improved, enhancing user trust and engagement.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to missing WHOIS registration data, lack of HTTPS confirmation, and absence of security headers. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating poor compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. The site does not provide incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, limiting readiness for security events. No forms or data collection points reduce attack surface but also limit user interaction. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security best practices and transparency to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS across the entire website to secure user connections.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with data protection laws.
  3. Add clear contact information including business emails and phone numbers for transparency.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
毎日の健康は、栄養、メンタルヘルス、家族の健康、予防医療など、信頼できる健康情報を毎日お届けするサイトです。健康的な生活をサポートします。
Key services
health information articles, nutrition and diet advice, mental health guidance, family health tips, alternative medicine information, dental health, cancer information, public health and safety
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is in Japanese and focused on health topics.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links detected.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms present on the homepage.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS status could be confirmed from provided data.
  6. Multiple external partner domains linked, mostly health-related localized sites.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the HTML content.
  8. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is suspicious.
  9. Website design is basic but content is relevant and organized.
  10. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS without detectable CMS or advanced frameworks. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear navigation structure. No JavaScript libraries or analytics tools were detected, indicating minimal technical complexity. Performance is likely moderate given the simple structure. The lack of security headers and unknown SSL status represent technical risks. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS for easier content management, implementing HTTPS, and adding analytics for user insights.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 265health.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 265health.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.