Skip to main content

Security report for 25025.net

养老敬老网 · Healthcare · China

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

养老敬老网 is a Chinese elderly care information platform providing comprehensive resources on pension policies, elderly care institutions, home care services, and community support. The site targets elderly users and care providers, offering rankings, news, and forums to facilitate informed decisions and community engagement. Technically, the site is built on the Discuz! CMS platform with legacy JavaScript libraries and moderate mobile optimization. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacking modern security headers and using outdated libraries, posing potential risks. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data is missing, which raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, though the active content and service offerings suggest a legitimate operation. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but requires improvements in security and compliance to enhance trust and user safety.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 25025.net

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche in the elderly care sector in China, focusing on information dissemination and community interaction rather than direct service provision. Its business model revolves around content provision, advertising, and possibly membership services. The site leverages a popular Chinese CMS and integrates Baidu services for SEO and tracking. The absence of clear business registration data and privacy policies may impact credibility with more discerning users or partners. The platform's extensive content and active forum indicate a solid user base and engagement, positioning it as a valuable resource in its sector. Strategic partnerships or certifications could further strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are essential to mitigate common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.8.3) introduces vulnerabilities that could be exploited. No evidence of incident response or security policies is found, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires urgent updates to libraries and implementation of security best practices to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance defense against web attacks.
  3. Develop and publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance with data protection regulations and build user trust.
  4. Establish a security incident response plan and provide dedicated contact channels for reporting security issues.
  5. Consider WHOIS privacy transparency by registering accurate domain ownership information to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
养老敬老网
Description
养老社区多年高端养老服务机构，助力养老机构实现智慧养老，提供养老院、敬老院、社区养老、居家养老、老年公寓、农村养老等信息及配套服务，专业护理及养生知识，休闲娱乐，老年大学场所活动，免费养老云平台，提升运营管理效率，全面布局养老产业。
Key services
养老院排名, 养老政策解读, 养老护理员信息, 养老费用咨询, 养老论坛社区
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.3, Discuz! CMS, FlexSlider, SuperSlide, Animate.css
Frameworks
Discuz!
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu linksubmit
Marketing tools
Baidu push.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is content-rich and focused on elderly care and pension information.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No security headers detected; outdated JS libraries present.
  4. WHOIS data missing, domain registration status unclear.
  5. No contact emails found; phone numbers provided with clear context.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. Website uses Discuz! CMS, common in Chinese community sites.
  8. No evidence of adult or NSFW content.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by Discuz! CMS, a widely used Chinese forum and content management system, indicating a community-driven platform. It uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.8.3, FlexSlider, and Animate.css for UI effects and interactivity. The site loads external scripts from Baidu for SEO and push notifications. Mobile optimization is basic, with some responsive elements but room for improvement. Performance is moderate, with no explicit advanced caching or CDN usage detected. Accessibility features are minimal, and SEO practices are basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The technical stack is functional but dated, suggesting modernization opportunities to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 25025.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 25025.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.