Skip to main content

Security report for 24xtra.hu

Belépés ide: 24.hu · Media · Hungary

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

24xtra.hu is a user authentication portal associated with the Hungarian media brand 24.hu, providing login and registration services including social login options via Facebook, Apple, and Google. The site targets Hungarian-speaking users of 24.hu services and acts as a gateway for accessing content or services requiring user authentication. The business model centers on user identity management for a media platform. Technically, the site is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure using CloudFront CDN and employs Keycloak for single sign-on capabilities. The technology stack includes modern JavaScript modules and standard web technologies, but performance metrics are unavailable or minimal, indicating potential areas for improvement. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. From a security perspective, the site implements several important HTTP security headers and enforces HSTS with preload. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support critically undermine the security posture. No OCSP stapling or session resumption is configured, and no privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps. No contact or business information is provided on the site, limiting transparency. Overall, the site is functional as a login portal but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS configuration and privacy compliance to enhance trust and security. The domain registration is consistent with the 24.hu brand, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include obtaining a valid SSL certificate, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and improving performance and accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 24xtra.hu

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain 24xtra.hu is a relatively new asset (registered in early 2024) linked to the established Hungarian media brand 24.hu. The portal serves as an authentication gateway, likely supporting user access to premium or personalized content. The business leverages social login integrations to streamline user onboarding and authentication. Hosting on AWS and use of Keycloak indicate a modern approach to identity management. However, the lack of published business or contact information on the site limits external validation of business operations. The site’s reliance on third-party tracking services like segment and gemius suggests a focus on user analytics and marketing insights. The absence of privacy and cookie policies may expose the business to regulatory risks under GDPR. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed on the site.

Security posture

Security controls include a robust set of HTTP headers such as CSP, HSTS with preload, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection, which help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. However, the critical failure to deploy a valid SSL certificate and enable HTTPS severely compromises data confidentiality and integrity. The lack of OCSP stapling and session resumption reduces performance and security efficiency. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies is found, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. The site’s security posture is thus basic with significant gaps that must be addressed to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user data in transit.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  4. Add contact information and security incident response details to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any additional vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses nginx as the web server and is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure with CloudFront CDN for content delivery. Keycloak is used as the authentication framework, indicating a modern identity management solution. JavaScript ES modules are employed for client-side logic. Despite modern technologies, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support TLS protocols, which is a critical technical deficiency. Performance metrics are missing, suggesting no active monitoring or optimization. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level and includes accessibility features such as labels and aria attributes, but overall technical implementation can be improved by addressing SSL issues, adding performance monitoring, and enhancing SEO metadata.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 24xtra.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 24xtra.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.