Skip to main content

Security report for 2016ruanwen.com

媒介星网络科技有限公司 · Media · China

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

媒介星网络科技有限公司运营的2016ruanwen.com是一个专业的软文推广及新闻稿发布平台,成立于2016年,面向企业客户和营销人员,提供软文推广、新闻源营销、软文代写及定制企业推广方案等服务。该平台拥有丰富的媒体资源和企业合作,市场认可度较高,致力于为客户提供高效率、低成本的互联网品牌推广服务。网站内容丰富,设计专业,导航清晰,用户体验良好,适合目标客户群体使用。技术上,网站采用基础的jQuery和CSS技术,托管于阿里云,性能表现中等,移动优化和无障碍支持基本。安全方面,网站启用了HTTPS并使用验证码保护登录,但缺少DNSSEC和安全HTTP头,且无隐私及Cookie政策,存在一定合规风险。整体安全评分中等,建议加强安全策略和合规措施。网站无成人或不当内容,适合一般公众访问。

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 2016ruanwen.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

媒介星网络科技有限公司定位为国内专业的软文投放平台,拥有约8000家媒体资源和5000家企业合作,涵盖上市集团、政府机构及公关公司。其业务模式基于自助新闻发布平台和代理销售,提供多样化套餐和定制服务,满足不同企业的品牌推广需求。公司通过客户评价和成功案例展示其市场信誉和服务质量。合作伙伴众多,形成较为完善的生态系统。公司注册信息与网站内容一致,域名注册时间与业务成立时间匹配,显示出稳定的市场存在。未来增长潜力依赖于提升安全合规性和扩大市场影响力。

Security posture

网站安全成熟度处于中等水平。启用了HTTPS保障数据传输安全,登录表单集成了验证码防止自动攻击,但缺少关键安全HTTP头(如CSP、HSTS等),未启用DNSSEC,存在潜在DNS劫持风险。未发现隐私政策和Cookie政策,存在合规缺口,尤其在GDPR等法规环境下风险较大。无公开的安全事件响应或漏洞披露渠道,安全文化和事件管理能力未知。建议加强安全头配置,启用DNSSEC,完善隐私合规文档,并建立安全事件响应机制以提升整体安全防护水平。

Recommendations

  1. 启用DNSSEC以增强域名系统安全,防止DNS劫持。
  2. 制定并公开隐私政策和Cookie政策,提升合规性,尤其针对GDPR要求。
  3. 配置安全HTTP头,如Content-Security-Policy、Strict-Transport-Security和X-Frame-Options,防止常见网络攻击。
  4. 增强登录表单安全,添加CSRF防护和更严格的输入验证。
  5. 建立安全事件响应流程和漏洞披露渠道,提升安全文化和客户信任。
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
媒介星网络科技有限公司
Description
媒介星软文推广平台是目前广告市场上最专业的软文发布平台,汇集全国几千家媒体,专业软文发布、新闻发布、软文推广、微商推广、门户网站发布、提供高效的服务,客户自助注册就能发稿。为广大客户提供高效率,低成本的软文推广发布服务。
Key services
软文推广, 新闻源营销, 企业定制推广方案, 软文代写, 自助新闻发布平台
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Captcha on login form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone numbers, QQ contacts, and physical address.
  4. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  5. Login form includes captcha but lacks visible advanced security measures.
  6. Website uses jQuery and basic CSS, no advanced frameworks detected.
  7. Multiple external partner domains linked in footer as strategic partners.
  8. Content is business-focused, no adult or questionable content detected.
  9. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present.
  10. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

网站基于传统的HTML5和CSS技术,使用jQuery库实现交互效果,技术栈较为基础但稳定。托管于阿里云,域名注册时间较长,显示出一定的技术稳定性。网站性能表现中等,移动端优化和无障碍支持基本,SEO基础元素存在但未见高级优化。缺少现代前端框架和内容管理系统,存在技术升级空间。安全配置不足,缺少关键安全头和DNSSEC,存在潜在风险。整体技术架构适合当前业务规模,但建议逐步引入现代技术和安全最佳实践以支持未来扩展。
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 2016ruanwen.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 2016ruanwen.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.