Skip to main content

Security report for 19jamka.cz

Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

19.jamka.cz is a Czech language online golf community platform offering forums, articles, quizzes, a marketplace for golf equipment, and golf course reviews. It serves as a niche media site targeting golf enthusiasts primarily in the Czech Republic. The site is built on the XenForo forum platform, leveraging modern web technologies including HTTPS, Google Analytics, and Google Fonts. The technical infrastructure is moderately optimized with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and CSRF protections, though some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is limited due to absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, though a cookie consent mechanism is present. Business credibility is moderate with no public WHOIS data or company contact information, but active community engagement and consistent branding support legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  5. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 19jamka.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a community-driven media platform focused on golf, monetizing through community engagement and marketplace listings. It targets Czech-speaking golf players and enthusiasts, providing specialized content such as podcasts, quizzes, and detailed golf course reviews. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its niche focus and active user base. Revenue streams likely include advertising and marketplace transactions. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly disclosed. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and active forum discussions. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance privacy transparency and formalize business contact channels.

Security posture

The site demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS and secure cookie flags, CSRF token usage in forms, and no visible vulnerabilities in scripts. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security events. GDPR compliance is partial, lacking explicit privacy policies. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  3. Add explicit business contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance credibility and user support.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and update dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
A Czech golf forum website providing community discussions, articles, quizzes, marketplace for golf equipment, golf course reviews, and related content.
Key services
Golf discussion forums, Golf articles and podcasts, Quizzes related to golf, Marketplace for golf equipment and vouchers, Golf course reviews, Wiki and knowledge base
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
XenForo 2.3, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Fonts, FontAwesome
Frameworks
XenForo
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens in forms
  • Secure cookie flags (secure=true)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Czech language golf community forum with active user engagement.
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy or domain not registered in CZ NIC database.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is present but no explicit cookie policy page detected.
  5. Uses HTTPS with secure cookies and CSRF tokens indicating good security practices.
  6. Includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking user behavior.
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No business registration or company legal information found on site.
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses XenForo 2.3 as its CMS/forum platform, supported by jQuery and FontAwesome for UI components. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. The site is served over HTTPS with secure cookies and CSRF tokens, indicating good baseline security. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No hosting provider information was identified. Technical debt appears low but could be reduced by updating security headers and enhancing accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 19jamka.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 19jamka.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.