Skip to main content

Security report for zzdats.lv

ZZ Dats · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ZZ Dats is a Latvian IT company specializing in the development of information technology solutions primarily for the public sector, including municipalities. Their core offerings include a unified municipal system, DevOps services, and cloud computing solutions. The company also provides IT training and internship opportunities, indicating a commitment to workforce development. The website reflects a medium-sized, established business with a strong local market presence and a focus on digital transformation in government entities. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Slick Carousel, and Fancybox. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing purposes. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with multilingual support via WPML. Performance is moderate, and accessibility features are basic but present. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. The presence of ISO 27001 certification logos and multiple professional certifications indicates a mature security posture. However, the site lacks explicit security headers and a public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which are areas for improvement. Overall, ZZ Dats presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence with strong business credibility and compliance. The risk level is low, but enhancing security headers and publishing incident response information would further strengthen their security posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of zzdats.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zzdats.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ZZ Dats operates in the technology sector with a niche focus on public sector digitalization in Latvia. Their competitive advantage lies in their integrated municipal system and expertise in DevOps and cloud computing. The business model combines software development, consulting, and training services. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, support contracts, and training fees. The target customers are government entities and IT professionals. Growth indicators include active recruitment and participation in research projects. Partnerships with local organizations and use of recognized certifications enhance their market position. Strategic observations suggest a stable company with potential for expansion in digital government services.

Security posture

The company demonstrates a solid security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement, GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and ISO 27001 certification indications. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and a public incident response contact limits transparency. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file. Data protection officer contact information is not provided. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized incident response communication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated incident response page with clear contact channels for security issues to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Create and host a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize risks from vulnerable components.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA ZZ Dats
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ZZ Dats
Description
Informācijas tehnoloģiju risinājumu izstrāde
Key services
Vienotā pašvaldību sistēma (Unified municipal system), DevOps services, Cloud computing solutions, IT training and internships
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Slick Carousel, Fancybox, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, CookieConsent2
Frameworks
WordPress, WPML (multilingual plugin)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/deny options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related certifications (ISO 27001 logo shown)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Clear focus on IT solutions for public sector and municipalities
  3. Multiple up-to-date certifications and training offerings
  4. Active recruitment with detailed job vacancies
  5. Comprehensive contact information including multiple emails and phone numbers
  6. Cookie consent and privacy policy compliant with GDPR
  7. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools
  8. No visible security or privacy red flags
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern WordPress CMS with up-to-date versions of jQuery and popular UI libraries like Slick Carousel and Fancybox. It uses WPML for multilingual support and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and resource optimization. The technical stack is standard for a professional corporate site, with no critical technical debt observed. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the SSL configuration is excellent.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100 −2Medium33 findingsView report
  2. 63/100 +2Medium32 findingsView report
  3. 61/100 −1Medium33 findingsView report
  4. 62/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zzdats.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zzdats.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.