Skip to main content

Security report for zylon.ai

Zylon · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zylon is a technology company offering a private AI platform designed for enterprise customers who require data sovereignty by running AI solutions on their own servers. The website positions Zylon as a unique player in the private AI space, emphasizing self-contained and ready-to-go AI infrastructure. Technically, the site is built using Framer, includes Google Analytics and Syft for tracking, and is well-optimized for mobile devices with a professional design. However, it lacks critical compliance documentation such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and terms of service, which impacts its privacy compliance score. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are provided. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and transparency to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zylon.ai

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zylon targets enterprise clients seeking private AI solutions that maintain data sovereignty. Its business model revolves around providing an on-premise AI platform, differentiating itself by emphasizing privacy and control. The company appears to be a small technology startup or scale-up with partnerships including Nvidia and Cal.com for demo scheduling. Revenue streams likely include enterprise licensing or subscriptions. The lack of public contact details and compliance documents suggests a focus on direct sales and controlled customer engagement. The partnership ecosystem indicates strategic alignment with leading AI hardware and scheduling platforms, supporting growth and market positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data detected. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for enterprise trust and compliance. The use of third-party tracking scripts like Google Analytics and Syft introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. There are no visible vulnerabilities or outdated libraries detected in the HTML content. The absence of security headers and formal policies suggests room for improvement in security governance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add terms of service and a dedicated security policy page to enhance transparency.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zylon
Description
The only self-contained and ready-to-go AI platform that runs in your own servers. Bringing private AI to the enterprise.
Key services
Private AI platform, On-premise AI deployment, Enterprise data sovereignty
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer (website builder), Google Analytics, Syft (analytics/tracking)
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Syft
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Syft
Marketing tools
Syft
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  4. Site uses modern web technologies and tracking scripts
  5. Focus on private AI platform for enterprise customers
  6. Limited public business information and no certifications displayed
  7. Good design and user experience but lacks compliance documentation
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer platform, leveraging modern web technologies and fonts. It integrates Google Analytics and Syft for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and has a professional design with consistent branding. Hosting details are not explicit but likely use Framer's infrastructure or CDN services. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. There is no evidence of CMS beyond Framer. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of security headers and compliance documentation indicates areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zylon.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zylon.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.