Skip to main content

Security report for zupimages.net

Zupimages · Technology · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zupimages is a French-based free image hosting service established since 2009, offering users a simple and fast platform to upload and share images securely via HTTPS. The service supports multi-image uploads and provides instant links for sharing. It is supported primarily through advertising networks and targets a general audience seeking free image hosting solutions. The website demonstrates moderate digital maturity with a mix of legacy and modern technologies, including jQuery 1.10.2 and various ad and tracking services. While the site implements GDPR consent mechanisms and provides transparency on incident handling, it lacks a formal privacy policy page and security headers, which are important for compliance and security posture. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly that impacts trustworthiness, although the website content and service appear legitimate and professional. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in updating libraries, enhancing security headers, and publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zupimages.net

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention zupimages.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7
Employees
0
Customers
7
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
71%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for zupimages.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zupimages operates in the technology sector as a niche free image hosting provider with a significant user base evidenced by over 39 million images hosted. Its business model relies on advertising revenue, leveraging multiple ad networks and tracking services. The target customers are general internet users needing quick and free image hosting. The company maintains partnerships with various related service sites and promotes transparency in content moderation and abuse handling. However, the lack of visible company contact details and WHOIS data limits full business credibility assessment. Growth indicators include sustained service availability and incident communication. The partnership ecosystem includes ad networks and related web services, supporting monetization and user engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a consent management platform for GDPR compliance, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of detected security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.10.2) introduces potential vulnerabilities. Incident response is addressed with a public message about a recent service suspension due to illicit content and a clear abuse reporting link, indicating some operational security awareness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by updating libraries, implementing security headers, and formalizing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and security policy pages clearly accessible from the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or publish a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility features to enhance user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zupimages
Description
Hébergeur d'images et photos gratuit, simple d'utilisation, permettant l'hébergement instantané et sans limites d'images et photos avec accès sécurisé HTTPS.
Key services
Image hosting, Multi-image upload, Instant link generation, Image storage with no stated expiration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, InMobi Consent Manager, Quantserve, KueezRTB, TheMoneytizer Ads, PubX AI, Criteo, Smart AdServer, Teads Analytics, Leadplace Tag
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for GDPR
  • Abuse reporting mechanism
  • Incident transparency

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Quantserve, Teads Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
TheMoneytizer, Quantserve, KueezRTB, Criteo, Smart AdServer, Teads
Tracking pixels
Criteo, Quantserve, Leadplace
Marketing tools
Leadplace
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a free image hosting service with a large user base.
  2. Content is in French and targets general users needing image upload.
  3. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  4. Uses multiple advertising and tracking services.
  5. Implements GDPR consent management.
  6. No explicit privacy policy page found.
  7. Security headers not detected in provided data.
  8. Uses older jQuery version which may pose security risks.
  9. Incident transparency message indicates active content moderation.
  10. No phone or email contact explicitly found on main page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of legacy and modern technologies including jQuery 1.10.2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and multiple advertising and tracking platforms such as TheMoneytizer, Criteo, and Smart AdServer. Hosting is provided by OVHcloud as inferred from incident messages. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is basic with standard meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks a CMS indication and appears custom-built. The presence of multiple third-party scripts increases complexity and potential attack surface. Technical debt is indicated by outdated libraries and missing security headers. Modernization opportunities include updating libraries, improving security configurations, and enhancing privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zupimages.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zupimages.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.