Skip to main content

Security report for zueblin-tunnelling.com

Ed. Züblin AG · Transportation · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ed. Züblin AG is a leading German construction and engineering company specializing in high and civil engineering projects, including tunnel construction, bridge building, and infrastructure development. The company positions itself as the number one in the German market, offering a broad range of services from turnkey construction to sustainable building solutions. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content tailored to expert and professional audiences. Technically, the site leverages modern JavaScript libraries, Bootstrap framework, and is hosted on AWS infrastructure, indicating a robust and scalable platform. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS, employs cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR, and uses Matomo for analytics, demonstrating a good security posture. However, there is room for improvement in implementing additional security headers and publishing explicit security policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy, compliant, and well-maintained, supporting the company's enterprise-level stature.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zueblin-tunnelling.com

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention zueblin-tunnelling.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for zueblin-tunnelling.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate zueblin-tunnelling.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
3
Registered
3
Resolving
3
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • zu•••••••••.nelling.comLowsubdomain
  • zu••••••••••.elling.comLowsubdomain
  • zu•••••••••••.lling.comNot ratedsubdomain

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of zueblin-tunnelling.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation, real estate, and manufacturing sectors, focusing on large-scale construction projects. Its business model revolves around providing comprehensive construction services, including public-private partnerships and specialized engineering disciplines. The website's structured navigation and multiple regional directorates indicate a decentralized operational model with localized expertise. The absence of explicit contact information on the analyzed page suggests that contact details may be centralized or located on other pages. The company uses IBM Domino as a backend CMS, which is less common but suitable for enterprise environments. The presence of multiple domain redirects and consistent branding across domains reflects a strategic approach to brand management and market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS and GDPR-compliant cookie consent via OneTrust. The use of Matomo analytics indicates privacy-conscious tracking. However, the lack of several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page limits transparency for security researchers. Incident response contact channels are not publicly visible, which could be improved to enhance security readiness and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ed. Züblin AG
Description
Wir setzen Maßstäbe! Dieser Anspruch hat uns zur Nummer eins im deutschen Hoch- und Ingenieurbau gemacht. Unseren Kunden bieten wir ein umfassendes Leistungsspektrum für Bauvorhaben jeder Art und Größe.
Key services
Hoch- und Ingenieurbau, PPP (public private partnership), Partnering, Schlüsselfertigbau, Nachhaltiges Bauen, Tunnelbau, Umwelttechnik, Spezialtiefbau, Stahlbau, Lärmschutzsysteme
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, Bootstrap 3.3.5, Fancybox 3.0.47, FontAwesome 5.0.9, Swiper Slider 4.5.0, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent, Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy in place.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Use of IBM Domino backend inferred from .nsf URLs.
  5. Multiple domain redirects implemented for brand consistency.
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  7. No terms of service page explicitly found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  10. Strong focus on German market and engineering/construction sector.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap 3, Fancybox, FontAwesome, and Swiper Slider, indicating a mature but somewhat dated front-end technology stack. Hosting on AWS with DNS managed by Amazon Route 53 provides reliable infrastructure. The backend appears to be IBM Domino, inferred from .nsf URLs, which is uncommon but suitable for enterprise content management. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The cookie consent implementation via OneTrust and analytics via Matomo show a focus on privacy and compliance. Technical debt may exist due to older Bootstrap and jQuery versions, suggesting modernization opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zueblin-tunnelling.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zueblin-tunnelling.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.