Skip to main content

Security report for znesnaze21.cz

Nadační fond pomoci · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Znesnaze is a Czech Republic based non-profit crowdfunding platform established in 2014, operated by Nadační fond pomoci. It facilitates online fundraising campaigns to provide financial assistance to individuals and social projects in need. The platform emphasizes ease of use, transparency, and donor trust, with over half a million donors and thousands of campaigns supported. Technically, the website is built on the SolidPixels CMS, uses modern JavaScript libraries, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, supporting user consent mechanisms. However, WHOIS data is missing, which slightly impacts domain trustworthiness. Overall, the platform demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for its non-profit mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching znesnaze21.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention znesnaze21.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
89
Employees
0
Customers
89
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for znesnaze21.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform holds a strong market position in the Czech non-profit crowdfunding sector, leveraging a large donor base and verified campaigns to build credibility. Its business model focuses on enabling individuals and organizations to start fundraising campaigns without complex legal or financial setups. Revenue likely comes from a small fee on donations to cover operational costs. The target audience includes donors interested in social causes and individuals seeking financial help. Partnerships with organizations like Nadační fond pomoci and use of SolidPixels CMS indicate a stable operational ecosystem. Growth indicators include a large number of campaigns and donors since 2014. The platform maintains active social media channels to engage supporters and increase visibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms with validation, which are positive security practices. However, some common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy are not detected and should be implemented to enhance protection against clickjacking, cross-site scripting, and privacy leaks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of explicit security policies or incident response contacts is a gap in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and documented incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS and data injection attacks.
  2. Add X-Frame-Options header to prevent clickjacking attacks.
  3. Include Referrer-Policy header to control referrer information leakage.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly audit CMS and third-party libraries for vulnerabilities and keep them updated.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadační fond pomoci
Description
Znesnaze is a non-profit crowdfunding platform founded to connect people quickly and safely to provide financial assistance where it is really needed. It supports individuals and projects in difficult situations, enabling easy online fundraising without the need to establish a charity or transparent account.
Key services
Online fundraising campaigns, Donation management, Campaign verification and support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, SolidPixels CMS, YouTube embed
Frameworks
SolidPixels CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to non-profit crowdfunding.
  3. Strong social media presence and donor engagement indicators.
  4. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain transparency.
  6. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  7. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses SolidPixels CMS, a modern JavaScript stack, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance is moderate with some asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility is basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site uses multiple image sizes for responsive design and lazy loading for performance optimization. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the visible source. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with znesnaze21.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review znesnaze21.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.