Skip to main content

Security report for zgodovinska-mesta.si

Združenje zgodovinskih mest Slovenije · Non-profit · Slovenia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Združenje zgodovinskih mest Slovenije is a Slovenian cultural association dedicated to promoting the heritage and history of Slovenian historical towns. The website serves as an informational and promotional platform targeting the general public interested in culture and history. The organization appears to be a small non-profit entity founded in 2007, with a consistent brand presence and a clear mission to foster cultural awareness and collaboration among historical towns. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins for SEO and multilingual support, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and uses modern tracking and consent tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, although the absence of explicit security headers and privacy policy pages suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences, but could enhance compliance and security by publishing privacy and terms policies and improving security headers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zgodovinska-mesta.si

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association occupies a niche market focused on cultural heritage within Slovenia, targeting residents and visitors interested in historical towns. Its business model is non-commercial, focusing on cultural promotion and collaboration rather than revenue generation. The website supports multilingual content, indicating an intent to reach a broader audience including international visitors. The use of Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel suggests some level of marketing and audience analysis. The lack of direct contact information and formal policies may limit engagement and trust for some users. There are no indications of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content or WHOIS data. The organization benefits from a stable domain registration dating back to 2007, reinforcing its established presence in the cultural sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, which is a positive indicator for GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses third-party scripts including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, which require careful management to avoid privacy risks. The lack of a published privacy policy and incident response contact information represents a compliance gap and potential risk in case of data breaches or incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with additional security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, usage, and user rights.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to enhance legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Združenje zgodovinskih mest Slovenije
Description
Združenje zgodovinskih mest Slovenije vas vabi k odkrivanju kulture in preteklosti zgodovinskih mest ter soustvarjanju dediščine njihove prihodnosti.
Key services
promotion of historical towns, cultural heritage awareness, collaboration among historical towns
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, WPML (multilingual plugin), Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a cultural association site focused on Slovenian historical towns.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common SEO and multilingual plugins.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Uses Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Yoast SEO and WPML plugins, indicating a mature CMS environment with SEO and multilingual capabilities. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design principles. Performance is moderate, with minified CSS and JS assets cached. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. The site lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy/legal pages, which are technical debt areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small non-profit but could benefit from modernization in security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zgodovinska-mesta.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zgodovinska-mesta.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.