Skip to main content

Security report for zatopekmaraton.cz

Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Emil Zátopek Ostrava Golden Marathon website represents a professionally organized international marathon event held in Ostrava, Czech Republic, honoring the legendary athlete Emil Zátopek. The event offers multiple race categories including marathon, half-marathon, 10 km, and team races, targeting runners of all levels and athletics enthusiasts. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies to provide an engaging user experience. It is supported by official city and regional partners, enhancing its credibility and market position. Technically, the site employs a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, Swiper, and animation libraries, ensuring good performance and responsiveness. However, there is a lack of visible security headers and privacy/cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. The site uses Plausible Analytics, a privacy-focused analytics tool, indicating some attention to user privacy. Contact information is clearly provided, but no forms collecting sensitive data are present on the main page. From a security perspective, the absence of WHOIS data raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, though the professional nature of the site and its partners mitigate this risk. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and no critical vulnerabilities were found in the visible content. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid security posture but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security header implementation. The overall risk is moderate with recommendations to improve privacy disclosures, implement security headers, and clarify domain registration details to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zatopekmaraton.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The marathon event is positioned as a growing international sports event with strong local government and sports club partnerships. Its business model revolves around event organization, participant registration fees, and sponsorships. The target market includes amateur and professional runners, sports fans, and the local community. The event leverages the legacy of Emil Zátopek to build brand recognition and attract elite athletes. The partnership ecosystem includes city authorities and sports foundations, which strengthens operational capabilities and market reach. Growth indicators include a second edition planned for 2025 and active promotion through news and social media. The business operates in the transportation and hospitality sectors, with a focus on sports and community engagement.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries, which is positive for security. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The absence of visible privacy and cookie policies indicates a gap in GDPR compliance, especially given the European location. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in case of security issues. The use of Plausible Analytics suggests minimal user tracking, which aligns with privacy best practices. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, privacy disclosures, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear security incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Clarify domain registration details or use verified WHOIS data to improve trustworthiness and legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Organizes the Emil Zátopek Ostrava Golden Marathon, an international marathon event held in Ostrava, Czech Republic, honoring the legendary runner Emil Zátopek. The event includes marathon, half-marathon, 10 km, and team races with professional organization and elite participation.
Key services
Marathon race organization, Race registration, Event promotion, Athlete and fan engagement, Supporting charity and community involvement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Boxicons, Swiper, LightGallery, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Jarallax, Lottie Player, JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data on main page

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible
Marketing tools
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on a sports marathon event honoring Emil Zátopek.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies are visibly present.
  4. Contact information includes a phone number and a company email.
  5. No forms collecting personal data are present on the main page.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  7. External links mostly point to official partners and social media.
  8. Uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks for UI and animations.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  10. No visible security or incident response policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap framework with additional libraries for icons (Boxicons), sliders (Swiper), galleries (LightGallery), animations (AOS), parallax effects (Jarallax), and Lottie animations. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for performance with deferred script loading. SEO meta tags are present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data was found. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the content. The site uses Plausible Analytics for privacy-focused user tracking. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility is basic. There is room for improvement in SEO and accessibility features such as ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zatopekmaraton.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zatopekmaraton.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.