Skip to main content

Security report for zane.hr

Zagreb nekretnine d.o.o. · Real Estate · Croatia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zane nekretnine is a well-established Croatian real estate company operating since 1998, offering a comprehensive range of services including property brokerage, valuation, consulting, and market analysis. The company targets a general audience seeking real estate services in Croatia and maintains a professional online presence with a clear and consistent brand. The website is hosted on Akamai infrastructure, uses modern JavaScript libraries for UI components, and implements a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR requirements. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection in forms, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the website is accessible, professional, and trustworthy, reflecting the company's long-standing market position.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching zane.hr

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
73
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zane nekretnine operates in the real estate sector with a medium-sized team and a strong local presence in Croatia. Their business model focuses on service provision in property sales, valuations, and consulting. The company leverages its expertise and a large team of appraisers to maintain competitive advantage. The website supports lead generation through contact information and service descriptions but lacks visible social media engagement or advanced marketing tools. The partnership with local judicial experts is indicated by external links. The company appears stable with no suspicious domain or registration patterns.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. CSRF tokens are present in forms, indicating awareness of common web security practices. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, and security headers are not evident in the HTML content. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy is a gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with additional transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zagreb nekretnine d.o.o.
Description
ZANE provides real estate services including property sales, consulting, market analysis, property valuation, and related services. They have a team of 30 appraisers and offer a broad range of real estate related services.
Key services
Real estate brokerage, Property valuation, Consulting, Market analysis, Preparation of property documentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery (implied by slick slider usage), Google Fonts, CookieControl (Civic Cookie Consent), Photoswipe, Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • CSRF token present in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (commented out)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to real estate services
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with clear user options
  4. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  6. No social media links detected in the provided content
  7. No security headers detected in HTML content (headers not provided)
  8. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in HTML
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including Slick Carousel and Photoswipe for UI elements, Google Fonts for typography, and a third-party cookie consent tool (CookieControl). Hosting is via Akamai CDN, which supports performance and availability. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no JSON-LD structured data detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in script loading and caching. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with zane.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review zane.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.