Skip to main content

Security report for yoplanning.pro

YoPlanning · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

YoPlanning is a SaaS provider specializing in online booking, planning, and payment software solutions targeted at businesses and professionals requiring streamlined scheduling tools. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on ease of use and integration with popular social login providers such as Google, Apple, and Facebook. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including Django backend (implied), Google Cloud Storage for static assets, and integration with Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and responsive design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, CSRF protection, and secure login forms, although some security headers are missing and no explicit security or incident response policies are publicly disclosed. Privacy compliance is partial, with privacy and terms pages present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD limitations and privacy protection, which is common for SaaS providers but slightly reduces trust. Overall, the website is legitimate, functional, and professionally maintained with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching yoplanning.pro

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

YoPlanning operates in the technology sector offering niche SaaS solutions for online booking and planning. Its business model focuses on subscription or freemium access to its platform, targeting small to medium businesses and professionals. The presence of social login options indicates an emphasis on user convenience and integration with major identity providers. The company maintains a clean and consistent brand with a clear value proposition. However, lack of explicit contact information and limited public business details suggest a lean operation or early-stage company. The website's integration with Google and Facebook analytics tools supports marketing and user engagement efforts. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain or website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, CSRF tokens on forms, and secure password handling features such as password visibility toggling. Integration with OAuth providers for social login is implemented securely. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program is visible, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Privacy compliance is partial; cookie consent mechanisms are missing despite use of tracking technologies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website.
  2. Add cookie consent banners and mechanisms to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information including support and security contacts to improve business credibility.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or bug bounty program to encourage responsible security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
YoPlanning
Description
Online booking software - Online planning tool - Online payment - simple and intuitive application.
Key services
Online booking, Online planning, Online payment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, FontAwesome icons, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens in forms
  • Password visibility toggle
  • Social login integration with OAuth providers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel (implied by Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is focused on online booking and planning software
  3. Social login options enhance user convenience
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on login page
  5. Privacy and terms pages are linked but cookie consent is missing
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD not supported and privacy protection
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies publicly visible
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Django backend (inferred from CSRF tokens and URL patterns), Google Cloud Storage for static content delivery, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and marketing. The frontend uses CSS3 and HTML5 with responsive design elements and FontAwesome icons. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts to optimize page load. The site is mobile optimized and accessible at a basic level. There is no evidence of a CMS. Hosting on Google infrastructure suggests reliability and scalability. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve SEO and accessibility features further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with yoplanning.pro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review yoplanning.pro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.