Skip to main content

Security report for yazaki-na.com

Yazaki North America · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Yazaki North America operates as a major player in the automotive components sector, specializing in power distribution, data connectivity, and display technologies for vehicles. The company emphasizes innovation, environmental responsibility, and global presence with operations in 46 countries. Their product portfolio includes wiring harnesses, connectors, sensors, and hybrid electric vehicle components, targeting automotive manufacturers and suppliers. The website reflects a professional corporate identity with clear navigation and relevant content aimed at industry professionals and potential employees. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with a moderate performance profile. Security is enforced through HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though additional security headers and explicit security policies are absent. From a security perspective, the site shows a solid baseline with encrypted communications and privacy compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS data and registrant information introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site lacks explicit incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies, which could be improved to enhance trust. Overall, Yazaki North America’s website is a credible and professional digital presence supporting their business operations. Strategic improvements in transparency, security policy publication, and WHOIS data availability would strengthen their security posture and stakeholder confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: bm-c01.us.yazaki.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

  5. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: RPC

      Port 135 (RPC) is publicly accessible - RPC - Windows RPC endpoint

      What to do: Consider restricting access to RPC or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching yazaki-na.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Yazaki North America holds a strong market position as a global leader in automotive power and data solutions, leveraging a broad product range and extensive geographic footprint. Their business model focuses on manufacturing and supplying critical automotive components, with a clear emphasis on innovation and environmental sustainability. The company targets automotive OEMs and suppliers, supported by a comprehensive digital presence including product catalogs and career portals. Partnerships and integrations with service portals and component catalogs indicate a mature operational ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent news on strategic partnerships and service agreements. The company maintains active social media channels to engage with stakeholders and enhance brand visibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps in their security framework. No exposed credentials or vulnerabilities were identified in the content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy policies and cookie banners. The missing WHOIS data reduces transparency and could be a risk factor. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate site but could benefit from enhanced security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance WHOIS data transparency by ensuring domain registration details are publicly available and consistent with business identity.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Yazaki North America
Description
Yazaki is a global leader in automotive power, data and display technologies, delivering robust power and data networks, connectivity solutions and associated products including instrumentation, wiring harnesses, connectors, and hybrid electric vehicle components.
Key services
Power distribution and control, Hybrid and electric vehicle components, Wire harnesses, Connectors, Sensors, Driver information systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Elfsight Instagram Widget
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to automotive industry
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and compliant
  5. Social media presence is strong with official accounts linked
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, reducing transparency
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  8. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies with a focus on responsive design and accessibility. Integration of analytics and marketing tools is well implemented, supporting data-driven decision making. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in media delivery and script loading. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting details are not explicitly available. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities include adding security headers and improving SEO metadata. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with yazaki-na.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review yazaki-na.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.