Skip to main content

Security report for yanosik.pl

Yanosik · Transportation · Poland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Yanosik is a well-established Polish driver assistance platform that provides real-time road hazard alerts, free navigation, and driver devices to a large community of over 2 million monthly users. The business operates primarily in the transportation and technology sectors, offering a community-driven model supported by product sales and subscription services. The website is professionally designed using modern Angular technology, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though improvements can be made by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Privacy compliance is strong, with a comprehensive cookie policy and GDPR-aligned consent management. Overall, Yanosik presents a credible and trustworthy digital presence with a clear market position in Poland.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching yanosik.pl

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention yanosik.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,697
Employees
0
Customers
1,697
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
16%

19 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for yanosik.pl.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Yanosik holds a leading position in Poland's driver assistance market, leveraging a large user base and community contributions for real-time traffic and hazard information. Its business model combines free navigation services with monetization through device sales, insurance offers, and advertising partnerships. The company maintains strategic partnerships with related domains such as Radio Yanosik and its online store, enhancing its ecosystem. The platform's growth is supported by integration with major advertising and analytics tools, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. However, direct contact information and detailed corporate data are not prominently displayed, which could be improved for enhanced business transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA, and a detailed cookie consent mechanism. However, the absence of DNSSEC and some common security headers represents areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the site is secure for general use but could benefit from enhanced DNS security and formalized vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Consider adding clear contact information and terms of service to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Yanosik
Description
Yanosik is a driver assistance system created by drivers for drivers, providing warnings about road situations such as hazards, accidents, speed cameras, and police controls. It serves a community of over 2 million drivers monthly.
Key services
Real-time road hazard alerts, Free navigation, Driver devices (Yanosik RS, GTm, XS, GTR), Insurance offers, E-vignette services, Advertising and partnerships
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 16, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes Consent Management, Cloudflare (implied by cookies), Material Icons, Google Analytics, Google Ads
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration (cookies rc::a and rc::c)
  • Session management cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, YouTube tracking cookies
Marketing tools
CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established Polish driver assistance platform.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage.
  4. No explicit terms of service found in provided content.
  5. Uses modern Angular framework and integrates multiple third-party services.
  6. No WAF or blocking detected, full content accessible.
  7. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  8. Good privacy compliance with GDPR-consistent cookie policy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern Angular framework (version 16), utilizing Google Fonts, Material Icons, and integrates Google Tag Manager and CookieYes for analytics and consent management. Hosting appears to be managed via home.pl S.A. with Cloudflare services implied by cookies. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses a single-page application architecture with structured JSON-LD data for SEO. There is no indication of a traditional CMS, suggesting a custom-built solution. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and incomplete security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with yanosik.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review yanosik.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.