Skip to main content

Security report for wwf.fi

WWF Suomi · Non-profit · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WWF Suomi is a well-established non-profit environmental organization focused on nature conservation and sustainable coexistence between humans and nature in Finland and globally. The website serves as a comprehensive platform for education, awareness, live nature broadcasts, and fundraising activities. It holds a strong market position as a leading environmental NGO in Finland, supported by a large audience of donors and environmental supporters. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as WooCommerce for e-commerce, Cookiebot for privacy compliance, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is hosted with Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, ensuring good performance and security. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with GDPR regulations, making it a reliable and credible digital presence for WWF Suomi.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wwf.fi

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wwf.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for wwf.fi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WWF Suomi operates primarily in the non-profit sector with a focus on environmental conservation. Its business model relies on donations, sponsorships, partnerships, and public engagement campaigns. The organization targets a broad audience including the general public, environmental activists, educators, and corporate partners. The website supports multiple initiatives such as endangered species protection, climate change awareness, and sustainable living guides. The presence of dedicated subdomains for e-commerce and recruitment indicates a mature operational structure. The organization benefits from a strong brand and trust signals, including official registration data and transparent contact information. Growth opportunities include expanding digital engagement and enhancing partnerships.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, cookie consent with blocking mode, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Use of reputable third-party scripts and analytics is evident. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not visibly set in the HTML and should be verified server-side. There is no public security policy or incident response contact information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the provided content. Overall, the site aligns well with best practices for a non-profit organization handling user data and donations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact details to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance data retention and privacy disclosures to align with evolving GDPR and NIS2 requirements.
  5. Continue improving mobile optimization and accessibility to maintain excellent user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MAAILMAN LUONNON SÄÄTIÖ WWF
Registration number
0215186-5
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WWF Suomi
Description
Tavoitteenamme on maapallo, jossa luonto ja ihmiset elävät sopusoinnussa. Tule mukaan pelastamaan maailman ainutlaatuisimpia luontokokonaisuuksia ja uhanalaisimpia lajeja.
Key services
Environmental conservation projects, Public awareness and education, Donation and sponsorship programs, Live nature broadcasts, Publishing guides and educational materials
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WooCommerce, Gravity Forms, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Cookie consent banner with blocking mode
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Strong branding and consistent messaging about environmental conservation
  3. Comprehensive navigation with clear menu structure and campaign highlights
  4. Use of modern web technologies and compliance tools like Cookiebot
  5. No exposed sensitive information or suspicious links
  6. Good use of structured data for SEO and social media integration
  7. Clear calls to action for donations and participation
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Twitter confirmed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, Gravity Forms for form handling, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Cloudflare, which also likely provides CDN and security benefits. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site employs structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration. There is room for improvement in security header implementation and possibly performance optimization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence for WWF Suomi.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wwf.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wwf.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.