Skip to main content

Security report for wtcpoznan.pl

World Trade Center Poznań Sp. z o.o. · Real Estate · Poland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

World Trade Center Poznań Sp. z o.o. is a medium-sized Polish company established in 2012, providing a broad range of services including cleaning, disinfection, renovations, conference room rentals, office leasing, hotel reservations, event organization, promotional material production, and employee recruitment. The company targets business clients and professionals in Poznań and surrounding areas, leveraging strategic partnerships and a recognized brand presence. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and consistent with the company's business model and market positioning. Technically, the website uses AngularJS framework and is likely powered by the Umbraco CMS, hosted by OVH SAS. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented with granular user options, reflecting good privacy compliance. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics, LinkedIn, and Meta Platforms, with moderate user tracking. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and employs cookie consent best practices but lacks explicit security headers and dedicated security or incident response policies. WHOIS data confirms a long-standing domain registration consistent with the business's history and legitimacy. No suspicious or malicious content was detected. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence with room for improvement in security policy transparency and technical security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wtcpoznan.pl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and hospitality sectors, focusing on facility management and event services. Its business model combines service provision with venue and office space leasing, supported by a network of strategic partners including international trade organizations and local event platforms. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on B2B clients seeking comprehensive facility and event solutions. The presence of a newsletter and social media engagement suggests active marketing and customer relationship management. The company benefits from a stable domain registration and reputable hosting, supporting its market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that respects GDPR requirements. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and mitigation. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from enhanced security policies and technical controls to improve resilience against common web threats.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans to identify and remediate risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
World Trade Center Poznań Sp. z o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
World Trade Center Poznań Sp. z o.o.
Description
World Trade Center Poznań offers services including cleaning, disinfection, renovation, conference room rental, office space leasing, hotel reservations, event organization, production of promotional and TV materials, and employee recruitment.
Key services
Cleaning and disinfection, Renovations, Conference room rental, Office space leasing, Hotel reservations, Event organization, Promotional and TV material production, Employee recruitment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS (ng-app, ng-controller), JavaScript bundles, CSS custom properties, SVG icons
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with granular options
  • No exposed emails or sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URLs

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag), LinkedIn
Marketing tools
Google Consent Mode
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Clear cookie consent mechanism with detailed options.
  3. Multiple service offerings with clear navigation.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response contacts.
  6. WHOIS data shows long-term domain registration with OVH SAS.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. CMS likely Umbraco based on URL patterns.
  9. No explicit email addresses or phone numbers found in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using AngularJS and served with JavaScript and CSS bundles, indicating a modern single-page application approach. The CMS is likely Umbraco, inferred from URL patterns. Hosting is provided by OVH SAS, a reputable provider. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses SVG icons for scalability. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load speed and resource optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph properties. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wtcpoznan.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wtcpoznan.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.