Skip to main content

Security report for write.as

Musing Studio · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Write.as is a privacy-focused minimal blogging platform operated by Musing Studio, founded in 2015 and based in the United States. The platform emphasizes distraction-free writing, privacy, and ease of publishing, supporting anonymous and multi-identity blogging with integration into federated social networks like Mastodon. It offers subscription plans for individual prolific writers and teams, with features such as custom domains, ActivityPub federation, and email subscriptions. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and consistent branding, targeting writers and privacy-conscious users. Technically, Write.as uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and leverages the open source WriteFreely platform. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly. Analytics are handled via Matomo, reflecting a privacy-conscious approach. However, no cookie consent mechanism was detected, which may impact compliance in some jurisdictions. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and shows no signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. Security headers are not explicitly detected, and no public security policy or incident response information is available. There is no vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file published. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional transparency and controls. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, showing a legitimate and stable registration with no privacy protection masking ownership. The domain age aligns with the company's founding date, supporting trustworthiness. Social media presence and partner domains further reinforce legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to enhance compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching write.as

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Write.as occupies a niche market focused on privacy and simplicity in blogging, differentiating itself from complex CMS and social media platforms. Its subscription-based SaaS model with free anonymous writing attracts individual writers and teams seeking distraction-free publishing. The company leverages an ecosystem of related services under Musing Studio, including Snap.as, Submit.as, and Remark.as, enhancing its value proposition. The open source foundation via WriteFreely supports transparency and community trust. Growth indicators include clear pricing tiers, free trials, and integration with federated networks. The partnership ecosystem is tightly integrated, supporting cross-service functionality. The company maintains a founder-owned, small business profile with a consistent brand and professional content.

Security posture

Write.as demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, no visible sensitive data exposure, and use of privacy-respecting analytics. However, the absence of explicit security headers, public security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents gaps in transparency and readiness. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism may pose compliance risks under GDPR and similar regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Overall, the security culture appears privacy-focused but could benefit from enhanced documentation and user-facing security assurances.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Provide clear contact channels for security incidents to improve trust and responsiveness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Musing Studio
Description
Write.as is a minimal blogging platform focused on distraction-free writing and privacy. It allows users to publish content anonymously or under multiple identities, supports custom domains, and integrates with federated platforms like Mastodon.
Key services
Minimal blogging platform, Anonymous and multi-identity writing, Custom domain support, ActivityPub federation, Email subscriptions, Photo hosting, Team collaboration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, WebFont Loader, Markdown editor, ActivityPub
Platforms
WriteFreely (open source blogging platform)
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • No forms collecting sensitive data without context

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo (piwik)
Transparency
excellent

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear focus on privacy and minimalism.
  3. No direct company emails or phone numbers found on main pages; contact is via contact form.
  4. No cookie consent banner detected despite privacy policy presence.
  5. Use of Matomo analytics indicates privacy-conscious tracking.
  6. Social media presence includes Mastodon, Bluesky, and Instagram with verified links.
  7. Pricing and service tiers clearly described with free trials.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern, lightweight technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, leveraging the open source WriteFreely platform. It uses WebFont Loader for custom fonts and integrates ActivityPub for federation. The site loads quickly and is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices. Analytics are handled via Matomo, reflecting a privacy-conscious approach. No CMS other than WriteFreely is detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely cloud-based. The site shows no technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to enhance accessibility features and implement additional security headers to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 51/100 −12Medium31 findingsView report
  2. 63/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with write.as. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review write.as.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.