Skip to main content

Security report for wpbeaverbuilder.com

Beaver Builder · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Beaver Builder is a well-established WordPress page builder plugin and theme provider, offering drag-and-drop website building tools targeted at freelancers, agencies, business owners, and WordPress professionals. The company positions itself as a trusted solution with over one million sites using its products, emphasizing ease of use, design flexibility, and integration capabilities. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, professional design, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Reddit Pixel. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and hCaptcha on forms, though explicit security headers and policies are not clearly documented. The absence of WHOIS registration data limits domain trust verification, but the overall site quality and community engagement suggest a legitimate business. Privacy compliance is basic, with cookie consent mechanisms present but no clear privacy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of wpbeaverbuilder.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wpbeaverbuilder.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Beaver Builder operates in the technology sector, specifically in WordPress website building tools. Its business model revolves around software licensing and SaaS offerings, including plugins, themes, templates, and add-ons. The company targets a broad audience from individual freelancers to agencies and enterprise users. Market positioning is strong with a large user base and positive testimonials. The ecosystem includes partnerships and related services such as Assistant.pro for templates. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans and add-on sales. The company maintains active social media channels and a supportive community, enhancing customer engagement and retention.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enabled and anti-spam measures like hCaptcha on forms. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident. Security headers are not explicitly confirmed, suggesting room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of WHOIS data and domain registration transparency is a concern for domain legitimacy but does not directly impact website security. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business type but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages prominently linked on the website.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Beaver Builder
Description
Easily build beautiful, responsive WordPress pages in minutes. Beaver Builder is a drag and drop WordPress Page Builder.
Key services
WordPress Page Builder Plugin, Beaver Builder Theme, Beaver Themer, Templates, Add-ons and Integrations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, WooCommerce 9.8.2, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel, Google Adsense, jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of hCaptcha on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
Metorik Helper
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Professional WordPress-based site with strong branding and clear business focus
  3. Multiple marketing and analytics tools integrated
  4. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  5. WHOIS data missing or protected, limiting domain trust verification
  6. Use of hCaptcha on newsletter form indicates anti-spam measures
  7. Strong social media presence and community engagement indicated
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with WooCommerce and integrates several popular plugins and libraries including Gravity Forms, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and Yoast SEO. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Facebook and Reddit pixels for marketing and retargeting. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, with some scripts deferred or asynchronously loaded. The technical infrastructure is robust but could benefit from explicit documentation of security headers and enhanced privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wpbeaverbuilder.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wpbeaverbuilder.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.