Skip to main content

Security report for wpbakery.com

Rain-Task Ltd. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WPBakery Page Builder is a mature and widely adopted WordPress plugin developed by Rain-Task Ltd., established in 2009. It offers an intuitive drag-and-drop interface for building WordPress pages without coding, targeting website developers and content creators globally. The company positions itself as a market leader with over 5.8 million active users, providing a comprehensive product suite including addons, templates, and AI-powered content generation tools. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with strong SEO and user experience design. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce integration, leveraging modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent compliance, though some improvements in security headers and explicit security policies are recommended. Overall, the site demonstrates high business credibility and digital maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wpbakery.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on WordPress plugin development and sales. Its business model is based on lifetime license sales and addon monetization, supported by a dedicated support team and extensive online resources. The target market includes WordPress users seeking easy-to-use page building solutions. The presence of affiliate partnerships with Envato Market and Codecanyon expands its sales channels. The company maintains a strong online presence with active social media engagement and a comprehensive knowledge base. Growth indicators include continuous product updates, AI feature integration, and a large user base. Strategic partnerships and a transparent vulnerability reporting process enhance trust and operational resilience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and cookie consent mechanisms that comply with GDPR. The use of Google reCAPTCHA protects against spam and bots. However, the absence of security headers like CSP, HSTS, and a published security.txt file indicates room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. Incident response contact channels are not explicitly provided, which could be enhanced to improve security readiness. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from formalized policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response communication.
  4. Provide explicit security policy documentation and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rain-Task Ltd.
Description
WPBakery Page Builder is a WordPress plugin that provides an intuitive drag and drop interface to build any page fast and easy with unlimited layouts.
Key services
WordPress page builder plugin, Template library, Addons and extensions, AI content and code generation assistant, Professional online support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, CookieYes Consent Management
Frameworks
WooCommerce, WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Sourcebuster
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
AddToAny social sharing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent banner with detailed categories and granular controls
  3. Multiple external analytics and advertising scripts present
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  5. Professional design and clear navigation
  6. Active security vulnerability reporting page
  7. No security.txt file detected
  8. No explicit security policy page found
  9. No data protection officer contact found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a stable WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses a modern tech stack including jQuery and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site uses Cloudflare DNS and is registered with NameCheap, indicating reliable hosting and domain management. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and DNSSEC could further strengthen the infrastructure. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with opportunities for modernization in security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wpbakery.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wpbakery.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.