Skip to main content

Security report for wonnacottpartnership.co.uk

Wonnacott · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wonnacott is a small, professional chartered surveying firm specializing in residential property surveys and related consultancy services primarily serving South West London and surrounding areas. The company offers a range of RICS-accredited surveying services including building surveys, homebuyer reports, market valuations, and party wall act consultancy. Their market position is that of a trusted local expert with professional accreditations and clear contact channels. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicate GDPR compliance awareness. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern for domain legitimacy verification but does not detract significantly from the business credibility given the professional content and trust signals present.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wonnacottpartnership.co.uk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Wonnacott operates in the real estate sector focusing on property surveying services. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting property buyers, owners, and developers in a localized geographic market. The company leverages RICS accreditation as a competitive advantage and maintains a professional online presence with clear contact information and trust indicators such as terms of use and privacy policies. The website suggests a small-sized enterprise with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. Marketing efforts include Google Analytics and cookie consent for compliance. The partnership with The Property Jungle for website development indicates a professional approach to digital presence. Growth indicators are not explicit but the comprehensive service offering and local focus suggest a stable market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and Google reCAPTCHA v3 deployed to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth strategies. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and cookie consent scripts should be regularly audited to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small professional service website but could be improved with enhanced headers and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response policy or security contact information to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  3. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve usability for all users.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Wonnacott
Description
Chartered Surveyors covering Middlesex and surrounding areas. Providing surveys, reports, cost assessments, schedule of dilapidation/condition
Key services
Building Surveys, RICS Level 3 Home Survey, RICS Level 2 Home Survey, RICS Level 1 Home Survey, Market Valuation Reports, Building Reinstatement Cost Assessment, Party Wall Act consultancy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Cookie Consent by freeprivacypolicy.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented
  • Cookie consent banner with express consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for a small chartered surveying firm.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for security hardening.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA indicates standard tracking and bot protection.
  6. No forms detected in the HTML content provided; contact is via email and phone links.
  7. No social media links found in the content.
  8. No incident response or security contact information found.
  9. RICS certification logo present, enhancing trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery. It integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot mitigation and uses a cookie consent solution from freeprivacypolicy.com to comply with privacy regulations. The site loads fonts via preloading for performance optimization and includes Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and appropriate meta viewport settings. Performance is moderate with some use of PageSpeed optimizations (e.g., pagespeed URLs for images and scripts). No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The site lacks advanced frameworks or platforms but is technically sound for a small business website. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wonnacottpartnership.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wonnacottpartnership.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.