Skip to main content

Security report for woday.eu

World Obesity Day Europe · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

World Obesity Day Europe is an informational and advocacy website focused on raising awareness about obesity issues within Europe. The site targets a broad audience including the general public, healthcare professionals, and policymakers. It operates primarily as a non-commercial platform to disseminate information and promote related events. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, hosted by One.com A/S, and employs modern web fonts and media integrations such as Vimeo. Analytics are handled via Fathom Analytics and Google Tag Manager, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and visible policies, which could be improved. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching woday.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
85
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche position as a health advocacy platform focusing on obesity awareness in Europe. It does not appear to operate a commercial business model but rather serves as an informational resource. The lack of explicit business contact details and policies suggests a small-scale or non-profit operation. The use of standard CMS and hosting services indicates a cost-effective approach to web presence. The site’s partnerships or related domains are not evident from the data, limiting insights into its ecosystem. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible, consistent with an advocacy focus rather than commercial activity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Vimeo introduces potential risk vectors that require monitoring. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. To improve security maturity, the site should implement recommended headers, publish security policies, and establish incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add clear contact information including security incident response contacts to facilitate communication and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
World Obesity Day Europe
Description
The website is dedicated to World Obesity Day Europe, focusing on raising awareness about obesity in Europe. It appears to be an informational and advocacy platform rather than a commercial business.
Key services
Information dissemination, Awareness campaigns, Event promotion related to obesity
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Open Sans, Montserrat, Poppins), Vimeo Player, Fathom Analytics
Frameworks
Divi Theme (WordPress)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Fathom Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Fathom Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an informational and advocacy platform for World Obesity Day Europe.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or indicated in metadata.
  3. No explicit contact information such as emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML content.
  4. Uses WordPress with Divi theme, indicating a standard CMS setup.
  5. Includes Google Fonts and Vimeo for media content.
  6. Uses Fathom Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking.
  7. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the provided content.
  10. No security or incident response policies or contacts found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely adopted CMS (WordPress) with the Divi theme, which provides flexibility and ease of content management. The inclusion of Google Fonts and Vimeo indicates a focus on visual appeal and multimedia content. Hosting by One.com A/S suggests a standard shared hosting environment. Performance is moderate, with preconnect and preload hints for resources indicating some optimization efforts. Accessibility features are basic, with some screen-reader text present but no advanced ARIA roles detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and JSON-LD structured data, enhancing search engine visibility. Opportunities exist to improve technical robustness by adding security headers and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with woday.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review woday.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.