Skip to main content

Security report for wjpe.com

W.J. Parnis England Ltd · Transportation · Malta

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

W.J. Parnis England Ltd is a well-established maritime shipping and logistics company based in Malta, with a history dating back to 1899. The company offers a range of services including ship agency, transshipment, freight forwarding, and Malta flag registration for ships and yachts. Their market position is that of a trusted, family-run business with deep expertise in the Mediterranean shipping industry. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting clients requiring comprehensive maritime logistics solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder, supported by Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and basic accessibility features. No major technical issues or vulnerabilities were detected in the content. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Privacy compliance is basic, with privacy and cookie policies present but no clear GDPR compliance statements or data protection officer contacts. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and a solid technical foundation. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and enhanced privacy compliance would further strengthen the security posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wjpe.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on maritime shipping and logistics in the Mediterranean. Its competitive advantage lies in over a century of experience, personalized service, and a broad service portfolio including ship agency, transshipment, and freight forwarding. The business model is service-oriented, targeting shipping companies, yacht owners, and logistics clients. The presence of a subsidiary trucking service (petrucking.eu) indicates vertical integration in logistics. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear service descriptions and contact channels, supporting customer acquisition and retention. Partnerships and certifications, such as authorization by the Malta Financial Services Authority, enhance credibility. Growth indicators include a modern website and active social media presence.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, and third-party scripts appear standard and reputable. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, limiting transparency for security researchers. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels for security issues. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved with enhanced headers, documented policies, and clearer incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response information on the website, including dedicated contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by explicitly stating GDPR adherence and appointing a Data Protection Officer contact if applicable.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards, enhancing usability and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
W.J. Parnis England Ltd
Registration number
C399
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
W.J. Parnis England Ltd
Description
With over a century’s experience we have built up a wealth of knowledge and expertise in the maritime shipping industry.
Key services
Ship Agency, Transshipment, Malta Flag Registration for Ships and Yachts, Freight Forwarding, Trucking Services (via petrucking.eu)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot (consent management), jQuery, Font Awesome, Owl Carousel, Hummingbird performance plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URLs use https)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is relevant and focused on maritime shipping and logistics services.
  3. Clear navigation with dedicated pages for About, Services, Careers, Contact, and Quote requests.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are present, indicating some privacy compliance.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information on the site.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content.
  7. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  8. Presence of social media link to Facebook and LinkedIn.
  9. Phone contact clearly displayed with country code +356 (Malta).
  10. No email addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using well-known plugins for SEO, page building, and performance optimization. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are used for analytics and consent management, reflecting a mature digital marketing setup. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with some optimization via caching and asset minification. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the site uses HTTPS with valid certificates. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wjpe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wjpe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.