Skip to main content

Security report for windsorgreatpark.co.uk

Windsor Great Park · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Windsor Great Park is a historic and well-established visitor attraction and estate management entity located in the United Kingdom. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for visitors, offering information on the park's history, environment, activities, property lettings, membership options, and events. The business model focuses on tourism, property management, and community engagement through memberships and events. The site is professionally designed with excellent content quality and clear navigation, targeting a general audience including families and visitors interested in nature and heritage. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern themes and plugins such as Blocksy and Stackable Gutenberg Blocks. It employs Google Tag Manager and CookieYes for analytics and cookie consent management, respectively. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with structured data enhancing search engine visibility. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements multiple security headers. Cookie consent is granular and GDPR compliant, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to mitigate spam. However, there is no publicly available security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include publishing a security policy, establishing incident response contacts, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure process to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching windsorgreatpark.co.uk

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Windsor Great Park occupies a niche market position as a historic royal estate and visitor destination with diversified revenue streams including property lettings, memberships, retail, and event hosting. Its competitive advantage lies in its heritage brand and extensive natural and cultural assets. The business targets tourists, local residents, and commercial tenants, with growth potential in event management and membership engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes suppliers and service providers linked through the website. The digital presence reflects a mature operation with professional content and consistent branding.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive cookie consent, and bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA. Security headers are properly configured, reducing common web vulnerabilities. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure channels indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Compliance with GDPR is evident through cookie management and privacy policy. Enhancing these areas would improve overall security maturity and stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy page accessible from the website footer or main menu.
  2. Establish and publicize incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance visibility of contact information including phone numbers and emails for business and support.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Windsor Great Park
Description
Part of the Windsor Estate, Windsor Great Park is an ancient Royal landscape of forests, grasslands, lakes and gardens. Visitors can discover 1,000 years of history including historical monuments, rare wildlife and National Collections of plants and Champion Trees.
Key services
Visitor experiences and activities, Property lettings (commercial and residential), Membership programs, Event hosting and commercial licenses, Retail and food services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes Consent, Cloudflare (likely for CDN and security), Stackable Gutenberg Blocks, Blocksy Theme
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular categories
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories and descriptions.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Strong SEO and structured data implementation.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and themes.
  6. No evidence of security policy or incident response pages.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No data protection officer contact information found.
  10. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with a well-maintained theme and premium Gutenberg blocks plugin. It integrates Google Tag Manager and CookieYes for analytics and privacy compliance. The site uses Cloudflare services likely for CDN and security, contributing to good SSL and performance. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility features are well implemented. The site could benefit from performance optimization and clearer hosting provider identification. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure online presence with opportunities for further modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with windsorgreatpark.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review windsorgreatpark.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.