Skip to main content

Security report for williamreed.com

RE/MAX Gold Coast · Real Estate · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RE/MAX Gold Coast operates as a real estate brokerage focused on the Ventura, California market, offering property listings, home valuation, and mortgage services. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and integrates modern technologies such as Vue.js, Bootstrap, and various analytics and advertising tools. Despite the lack of WHOIS data, the site presents a consistent brand image aligned with the RE/MAX network. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and monitoring tools, but lacks explicit security headers and privacy compliance disclosures. Overall, the site is functional and credible but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching williamreed.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention williamreed.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for williamreed.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets home buyers and sellers in Ventura, CA, leveraging the RE/MAX brand to establish trust and market reach. Its business model centers on brokerage services and real estate listings, supplemented by mortgage and escrow services. The website's integration with third-party marketing and analytics platforms indicates a focus on lead generation and customer engagement. The absence of detailed WHOIS data suggests either recent domain registration or privacy protection, which should be monitored for legitimacy. Partnerships with mortgage and property management services expand its service ecosystem.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs New Relic for performance and error monitoring, indicating a proactive approach to security and reliability. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of visible privacy and cookie policies reduce compliance maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site should implement comprehensive privacy disclosures and security headers to enhance protection and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents or abuse reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them accordingly.
  5. Monitor domain registration status and WHOIS data to ensure ongoing legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RE/MAX Gold Coast
Description
RE/MAX Gold Coast is a real estate business specializing in property listings and real estate services in Ventura, CA and surrounding areas. The website offers property search, home valuation, agent profiles, mortgage services, and real estate news.
Key services
Property listings search, Home valuation, Agent profiles, Mortgage services, Real estate news
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, jQuery Form Validator, Vue.js, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, New Relic Browser monitoring
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Cloudfront CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security monitoring (New Relic)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic Browser, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a real estate agency site affiliated with RE/MAX.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the homepage HTML.
  3. Multiple external tracking and advertising scripts are used.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contacts found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  6. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  7. No WAF or security challenge detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Vue.js, Bootstrap, and integrates with Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics. Hosting is via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, supporting good performance and availability. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for local business. Accessibility features are basic but present. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and resource optimization. No CMS was explicitly detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with williamreed.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review williamreed.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.