Wildnis in Deutschland · Non-profit · Germany
Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.
Wildnis in Deutschland is a well-established non-profit initiative dedicated to creating and protecting wilderness areas in Germany. The website serves as an educational and advocacy platform, providing comprehensive information about wilderness, conservation efforts, and related funding programs. It targets environmentalists, policymakers, researchers, and the general public interested in nature preservation. The initiative is supported by a coalition of 22 conservation organizations, positioning it as a key player in the German environmental sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme, enhanced with SEO and security plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7 with reCAPTCHA. The hosting is managed via INWX, a reputable German registrar. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, with structured data implemented for enhanced search engine understanding. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and employs reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam. While explicit security headers are not fully visible in the HTML, the overall posture is solid with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies including consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. It effectively communicates its mission and engages its audience professionally. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and considering a security.txt file to improve vulnerability disclosure transparency.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.
Unable to find name servers for domain
What to do: Configure proper name servers for the domain
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention wildnisindeutschland.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for wildnisindeutschland.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with wildnisindeutschland.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wildnisindeutschland.de.