Skip to main content

Security report for whitcher-wildlife.co.uk

Whitcher Wildlife Ltd · Transportation · United Kingdom

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Whitcher Wildlife Ltd is a family-run ecological consultancy based in the United Kingdom, specializing in practical ecology surveys and environmental advice across infrastructure, industry, and private sectors. Established since 1998, the company positions itself as a trusted provider delivering high-quality ecological services including species-specific surveys, ecological impact assessments, and biodiversity net gain assessments. Their client base includes reputable organizations and local councils, indicating a strong market presence in the UK ecological consultancy sector. Technically, the website is built on OctoberCMS and leverages modern web technologies such as GSAP for animations, Owl Carousel for content display, and Google Analytics with IP anonymization for user insights. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a professional design, providing a positive user experience. Cookie consent mechanisms and a comprehensive privacy policy demonstrate attention to privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and employs privacy-conscious analytics configurations. However, the absence of visible security headers and lack of explicit security or incident response policies suggest areas for improvement. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable due to a domain registration error from Nominet UK, which raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and business information appear credible. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for Whitcher Wildlife Ltd, but the domain registration anomaly and minor security header omissions should be addressed to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching whitcher-wildlife.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Whitcher Wildlife Ltd operates in the ecological consultancy niche within the UK, targeting infrastructure, industry, and private sector clients requiring environmental compliance and wildlife protection services. Their competitive advantage lies in their long-standing experience since 1998 and a broad portfolio of ecological services. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering licensed ecological surveys and environmental advice. The presence of numerous reputable client logos and local council partnerships indicates a strong ecosystem of partnerships and a solid reputation. Growth indicators include a diverse service offering and active project showcases. The company maintains a small size but with a focused and specialized market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and privacy-conscious analytics settings. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. The WHOIS domain registration anomaly is a notable concern that could impact trust. Overall, the security culture appears basic but with room for enhancement to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve site security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve security communication.
  4. Clarify and publish contact emails and phone numbers for customer and security-related inquiries to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Investigate and resolve the domain registration anomaly with Nominet UK to ensure domain legitimacy and WHOIS transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Whitcher Wildlife Ltd
Registration number
4401613
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Whitcher Wildlife Ltd
Description
Family-run ecological consultancy providing practical ecology surveys and environmental advice across the UK to achieve compliance and protect wildlife.
Key services
Ecological surveys, Environmental advice, Preliminary Ecological Appraisals, Ecological Impact Assessments, Biodiversity Net Gain Assessments, Species-specific surveys (bat, badger, newt, water vole, etc.), Licencing and mitigation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery (implied by owl-carousel usage), Google Fonts (Poppins), Google Analytics (gtag.js), GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform), Owl Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Analytics IP anonymization
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out options

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional ecological consultancy with detailed service offerings and project showcases.
  3. Strong branding and consistent design with clear navigation.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy implemented with GDPR compliance indicators.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly shown on homepage or footer; contact form is linked.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to domain registration error, which is unusual and lowers trust slightly.
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML content; HTTPS is used.
  8. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and CMS (OctoberCMS).
  9. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on OctoberCMS, utilizing modern front-end libraries such as GSAP for animations and Owl Carousel for interactive content display. It uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics with IP anonymization, indicating a modern and privacy-aware technical stack. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, the absence of security headers and limited visible hosting information suggest opportunities for technical hardening and infrastructure transparency. The site’s technical implementation supports a professional user experience but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with whitcher-wildlife.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review whitcher-wildlife.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.