Skip to main content

Security report for whats.club

Bot2Zap · Technology · Brazil

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bot2Zap is a Brazilian technology company specializing in WhatsApp marketing automation and customer relationship management solutions. Their platform enables businesses to automate sales, marketing, and post-sales communication through WhatsApp, leveraging features such as smart inboxes, lead segmentation, and automated reminders. The company targets businesses seeking to enhance customer engagement via the world's largest messaging app. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack including jQuery, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, and Snowplow Analytics, hosted on a CDN with PWA capabilities and service worker support. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and CAPTCHA protections, though explicit security headers and policies are lacking. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and terms of service present but no cookie consent mechanism. The absence of WHOIS data raises some legitimacy concerns, but the active and professional website mitigates this risk. Overall, Bot2Zap presents a functional and professional digital presence with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching whats.club

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bot2Zap operates in the technology sector, providing SaaS solutions for WhatsApp marketing automation primarily in the Brazilian market. Their business model focuses on subscription-based access to marketing and CRM tools integrated with WhatsApp. The company leverages partnerships with cloud hosting and analytics providers to deliver scalable services. The website indicates a small-sized company with a focused product offering. The lack of explicit contact information and WHOIS data suggests a need for enhanced transparency to build trust. Marketing efforts include Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics tracking, indicating active user engagement monitoring. The presence of related service domains for login and chat generation shows an ecosystem approach. Strategic growth could benefit from clearer business disclosures and enhanced compliance measures.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern security practices such as service workers and CAPTCHA to protect user interactions. However, it lacks explicit security headers like Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to harden the site against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific disclosures. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adopting comprehensive security headers, publishing security policies, and implementing cookie consent to enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Provide clear and accessible company contact information including support emails and phone numbers to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bot2Zap
Description
Crie experiências convincentes e poderosas para seus clientes através do whatsapp. Vendas e atendimento utilizando todos os recursos do maior aplicativo de mensagens do mundo
Key services
WhatsApp marketing automation, Customer relationship management, Lead capture and segmentation, Automated messaging and reminders, Smart inbox with agent assignment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Snowplow Analytics, Service Worker for PWA, Mapbox for maps, reCAPTCHA v2 and Invisible reCAPTCHA, Friendly Captcha
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service Worker registered
  • Use of reCAPTCHA and Friendly Captcha for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Snowplow Analytics
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Snowplow Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is in Portuguese targeting Brazilian market
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  4. Privacy and terms pages exist but are basic
  5. No cookie consent banner detected
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, raising some legitimacy concerns
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a multi-screen site builder platform with jQuery 3.7.0, integrated with Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics, and Snowplow for analytics and tracking. It uses service workers to enable PWA features and improve performance. Hosting is via a CDN with static resource delivery. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern fonts and SVG graphics. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and CSS preloading. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to enhance accessibility and SEO further. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence suitable for the business model.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with whats.club. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review whats.club.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.