Skip to main content

Security report for wfp.org

UN World Food Programme (WFP) · Non-profit · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The UN World Food Programme (WFP) is the world's largest humanitarian organization dedicated to saving lives in emergencies and providing food assistance to build peace, stability, and prosperity for populations affected by conflict, disasters, and climate change. The organization operates globally with a presence in over 120 countries and territories, offering a broad range of services including emergency relief, food assistance, supply chain management, and resilience building. Their business model is non-profit, relying heavily on donations and partnerships with governments, NGOs, and private sectors. The website reflects a strong market position as a leading humanitarian entity with extensive outreach and engagement capabilities. Technically, the website is built on Drupal CMS and employs a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, TikTok Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Bing Ads for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with fast to moderate performance. The use of multiple languages and comprehensive content demonstrates digital maturity and global accessibility. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, implements multiple security headers, and follows best practices for secure forms and data handling. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. However, the WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection, which is justified given the organization's international and humanitarian nature. Overall, the WFP website is a highly professional, trustworthy, and secure platform that effectively supports the organization's mission. Strategic recommendations include maintaining regular security audits, monitoring third-party scripts, and establishing a public vulnerability disclosure policy to further enhance security posture and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wfp.org

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wfp.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10,276
Employees
889
Customers
6,583
Third parties
2,804
Weak passwords
13%

Latest record dated 2026-06-18 · 272 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for wfp.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –training.mdca.wfp.org2026-06-18
  • –trainings.communities.wfp.org2026-06-17
  • –wandaemon.wfp.org2026-06-17
  • –fs.auth.wfp.org2026-06-17
  • –crm.som.wfp.org2026-06-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WFP holds a dominant position in the humanitarian sector, focusing on food security and emergency relief worldwide. Its competitive advantage lies in its UN affiliation, extensive global presence, and diverse programmatic offerings. Revenue streams primarily come from donations, government funding, and partnerships. The target customer segments include donors, governments, NGOs, and affected populations. Growth indicators include expanding country operations and innovation initiatives. The partnership ecosystem is broad, involving governments, private sector, academia, and international institutions. The organization's operations are characterized by transparency, accountability, and a strong ethical culture.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure data handling practices. The use of Drupal CMS suggests regular patching and security updates. No vulnerabilities or compliance gaps were identified in the content analyzed. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. Incident response contact information is not explicitly found, which could be improved. Overall, the security culture appears strong, aligned with the organization's global reputation and operational requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicize a formal vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential supply chain risks.
  3. Enhance visibility of incident response contacts for security and abuse reporting.
  4. Continue to monitor and improve privacy compliance, especially regarding data retention policies.
  5. Maintain ongoing security training and awareness programs to uphold the organization's ethical culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UN World Food Programme (WFP)
Description
We are the world’s largest humanitarian organization, saving lives in emergencies and using food assistance to build a pathway to peace, stability and prosperity for people recovering from conflict, disasters and the impact of climate change.
Key services
Emergency relief, Food assistance, Humanitarian support and services, Supply chain management, Asset creation, Cash and market support, Climate action, Ending malnutrition, Food systems, Gender equality
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, TikTok Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Bing Ads, Drupal CMS, Leaflet.js (maps), Google Fonts
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens (implied by Drupal CMS)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, TikTok Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Bing Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Adalyser
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Analytics, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Content is comprehensive and aligned with humanitarian mission.
  3. Multiple language versions available indicating global reach.
  4. Strong presence of tracking and analytics scripts for marketing and user behavior analysis.
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content.
  6. WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection.
  7. No visible security or privacy policy gaps.
  8. Donation functionality is prominently featured.
  9. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Drupal).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust Drupal CMS platform, leveraging modern analytics and marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager, TikTok Analytics, and Facebook Pixel. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of third-party scripts and media content. The technical infrastructure supports a global audience with multilingual support and interactive features like maps. Technical risks are minimal but require continuous management of CMS updates and third-party dependencies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wfp.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wfp.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.