Skip to main content

Security report for wezeo.com

WEZEO · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WEZEO is a Slovakia-based software and product studio specializing in custom software development for fintech clients and businesses in Central and Eastern Europe. The company focuses on building hybrid applications and infrastructure with an emphasis on precision, agility, and trust. The website presents a professional image with clear business descriptions and modern design elements, targeting fintech companies and regional clients. Technically, the website is built using Framer, incorporates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and uses modern web fonts. The site is accessible, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, but lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information, which impacts its privacy compliance and business credibility scores. Security-wise, HTTPS is enabled, but no advanced security headers or incident response information are present, indicating room for improvement in security posture. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the active and professional website somewhat mitigates this risk. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires enhancements in privacy, security, and transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wezeo.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WEZEO operates in the niche fintech software development sector within the Central and Eastern European market. Its business model revolves around providing custom software solutions and hybrid app development services, targeting fintech companies and regional clients. The company leverages modern web technologies and analytics tools to support its digital presence. However, the lack of visible contact details and official registration information may hinder trust-building with potential clients. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused market approach. There is no evidence of parent companies or subsidiaries. The website's professional design and clear service offerings suggest a stable market position, but the absence of privacy and security policies could impact regulatory compliance and client confidence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates user tracking but without visible privacy controls or consent mechanisms, raising privacy compliance concerns. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy and could indicate registration issues or privacy protection not disclosed. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, policies, and transparency to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses to enhance business credibility.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Establish and disclose incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures to improve security culture and client trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WEZEO
Description
Custom software development for fintech & CEE clients. Wezeo builds hybrid apps & infrastructure with precision, agility & trust. Slovakia-based.
Key services
Custom software development, Hybrid app development, Infrastructure building
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Framer (website builder), Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is not registered according to raw WHOIS output.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the website.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the provided HTML content.
  5. Website uses modern fonts and Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. Website content is professional and focused on fintech software development in Slovakia.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer platform, leveraging modern web fonts and Google Analytics for tracking. It loads external scripts from trusted domains such as googletagmanager.com and fonts.gstatic.com. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter card tags. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. However, no advanced hosting or CDN information is available. The absence of security headers and privacy controls indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. The website would benefit from enhanced accessibility features and improved privacy implementations to meet modern standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wezeo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wezeo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.