Skip to main content

Security report for werkendoejebij.nl

Postcode Lottery Group · Non-profit · Netherlands

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.werkendoejebij.nl represents the Postcode Lottery Group, a well-established non-profit organization operating lotteries in the Netherlands to raise funds for charitable causes. The site targets job seekers interested in working for this organization and provides detailed information about departments, vacancies, and the company's mission. The business is large, founded in 1989, and has a strong market position in the Dutch lottery and charity sector. The website content is professionally presented, consistent in branding, and includes rich media such as videos and employee stories. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including the Elm framework for interactive components, Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, and embedded YouTube videos served via privacy-enhanced domains. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper metadata and structured data. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user control, reflecting good privacy practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR. However, no explicit security headers or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure information is available. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and compliant with privacy regulations. Strategic improvements could include publishing security policies, enhancing security headers, and providing clearer contact information for security incidents.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching werkendoejebij.nl

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
75
Email security
73
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Postcode Lottery Group operates as a marketing-driven non-profit entity focused on raising funds through lotteries for social and environmental causes. Its competitive advantage lies in its long history, strong brand recognition, and integrated marketing and analytics capabilities. The business model leverages multi-channel campaigns and member services to attract and retain participants. The target customer segment includes socially conscious individuals and job seekers interested in impactful careers. The organization maintains a robust partnership ecosystem, including its main corporate site and social media channels, supporting growth and engagement. Operationally, the company emphasizes data-driven decision making and digital innovation through dedicated tech and analytics teams.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy and GDPR requirements. The absence of exposed sensitive data and use of session tokens in scripts indicate good security hygiene. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent gaps in transparency and readiness. The site does not provide direct security contact channels, which could hinder timely incident reporting. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response procedures and contact information.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Provide clear company contact details including phone numbers and emails for general and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Postcode Lottery Group
Description
De Nationale Postcode Loterij en de VriendenLoterij zijn onderdeel van de Postcode Lottery Group, een internationale marketinggedreven organisatie zonder winstoogmerk. Ze organiseren loterijen om geld op te halen voor een betere wereld. Sinds 1989 is er €15 miljard ingezameld. Met 1.500 collega’s dragen ze dagelijks bij aan een betere wereld.
Key services
Organizing lotteries, Marketing campaigns, Member services, Data analytics, Technology development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Elm (frontend keyword search component), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag), YouTube embedded videos (nocookie domain), JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Elm
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce/UUID for session tokens in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong cookie consent mechanism with functional, statistics, and marketing categories.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  4. Social media presence is well integrated with official accounts.
  5. No terms of service page detected.
  6. Embedded videos require marketing cookie consent to play, indicating privacy-aware design.
  7. Use of Elm framework for interactive components.
  8. Good SEO and metadata with canonical link and meta description in Dutch.
  9. No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern and maintainable technical stack with Elm for frontend interactivity, supported by standard web technologies like HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. Google Tag Manager and Analytics are used for tracking and marketing insights, with privacy-conscious video embedding from YouTube. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good SEO practices including canonical links and structured data. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing media assets and leveraging caching strategies. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting details are not disclosed in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 79/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with werkendoejebij.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review werkendoejebij.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.