Skip to main content

Security report for werkenbijstrukton.nl

Strukton · Transportation · Netherlands

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Werken bij Strukton is a professional recruitment and employer branding website for the Strukton group, a leading infrastructure and rail systems company operating primarily in the Netherlands and Belgium. The site targets job seekers in civil engineering, rail infrastructure, and related technical fields, offering job vacancies, internships, and career development opportunities. The business model focuses on attracting talent and promoting Strukton as an employer of choice with a strong emphasis on sustainable infrastructure and employee development. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Slider, integrated with Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie consent management. Hosting is provided by LeaseWeb Netherlands B.V., a reputable provider with DNSSEC enabled, ensuring domain security. The site demonstrates good SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization, providing a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and uses DNSSEC. Cookie consent is actively managed, indicating GDPR compliance. However, there is no publicly available security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with strong business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic recommendations include publishing formal security and incident response policies, adding security headers, and providing explicit security contact channels to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching werkenbijstrukton.nl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention werkenbijstrukton.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for werkenbijstrukton.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Strukton holds a strong market position as a leader in infrastructure and rail systems in the Netherlands and Belgium. The company leverages a multi-subsidiary structure to cover various infrastructure sectors including rail, roads, and specialized infrastructure services. The website serves as a key channel for talent acquisition and employer branding, targeting technical professionals and young talent through vacancies, internships, and traineeships. The business model is focused on sustainable infrastructure development and employee growth, supported by a consistent brand presence and active social media engagement. Growth indicators include a well-maintained digital presence and integration with modern marketing and analytics tools. Partnerships and subsidiaries are clearly linked, reinforcing the group’s ecosystem.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks of interception and DNS spoofing. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found, indicating good hygiene. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection.
  3. Provide explicit security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) for incident reporting.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Strukton
Description
Werken bij Strukton. Wij dragen bij aan een veilige en bereikbare wereld, nu en in de toekomst. Met een focus op duurzame infrastructuur. Bij ons heb je fijne ontwikkelmogelijkheden, een goed salaris, gezellige sfeer en de mogelijkheid om hybride te werken.
Key services
Job vacancies, Internships, Traineeships, Career development, Employer branding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, Slick Slider, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional recruitment and employer branding site for Strukton group companies.
  2. Content is in Dutch and targets job seekers in infrastructure and rail sectors.
  3. Strong SEO and accessibility features present.
  4. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with clear consent mechanisms.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage; contact likely via dedicated pages.
  6. Social media presence is strong with official YouTube, LinkedIn, Instagram, and Facebook profiles linked.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the site.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with version 6.8.1, using popular JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Slick Slider for UI components. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are integrated for analytics and cookie consent management, reflecting a mature digital marketing setup. Hosting is provided by LeaseWeb Netherlands B.V., a reputable provider with DNSSEC enabled, enhancing domain security. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Technical risks are minimal, but the absence of certain security headers and formal security documentation represent areas for improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with werkenbijstrukton.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review werkenbijstrukton.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.