Skip to main content

Security report for werkenbijeigenhuis.nl

Vereniging Eigen Huis · Real Estate · Netherlands

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Email security and Network security.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vereniging Eigen Huis is a well-established Dutch association dedicated to supporting homeowners in the Netherlands. The website serves as an information and service platform targeting homeowners, providing resources and membership benefits. The association holds a strong market position within the real estate sector in the Netherlands, focusing on homeowner empowerment and related services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and SEO plugins, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and incorporates standard web technologies for user experience and performance. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS, uses reCAPTCHA for form protection, and implements a cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, reflecting a good security posture. However, explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and incident response contacts are not found in the provided content, representing areas for improvement. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with basic privacy requirements, but could enhance transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching werkenbijeigenhuis.nl

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
95
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association operates as a membership organization in the real estate sector, targeting Dutch homeowners. Its business model revolves around providing information, services, and advocacy for homeowners. The website links to partner domains related to energy services, mortgage advice, and form management, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The absence of direct contact details on the main page suggests a focus on digital self-service or member login areas elsewhere. The association likely generates revenue through memberships and related services. The website's SEO and content structure support its role as an authoritative resource in its niche. The presence of Cookiebot and Google Analytics indicates a moderate level of user tracking balanced with privacy compliance efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. The cookie consent banner powered by Cookiebot ensures compliance with EU cookie regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security headers are presumed present but not explicitly confirmed in the HTML snippet. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts is a gap in transparency and readiness. Regular audits of third-party scripts and plugins are recommended to maintain security hygiene. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by publishing formal security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy documents to enhance transparency.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and enhance user inclusivity.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and update plugins promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vereniging Eigen Huis
Description
Vereniging Eigen Huis is a Dutch association focused on homeowners, providing services and information to support and empower homeowners in the Netherlands.
Key services
Homeowner support, Information services, Membership benefits
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper, Magnific Popup, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Bootstrap 5.1.3
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • reCAPTCHA integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and SEO optimization
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with Cookiebot
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected
  7. External links include trusted domains and partner sites related to the association
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap 5, jQuery, Swiper for sliders, and Magnific Popup for modals. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, with proper meta tags and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search engine understanding. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for analytics and tracking, integrated with Cookiebot for consent management. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs and partner domains. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, ensuring usability across devices. Accessibility is basic, with potential for improvement. No signs of WAF or content blocking were detected, allowing full content access for analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with werkenbijeigenhuis.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review werkenbijeigenhuis.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.