Skip to main content

Security report for weply.dk

Weply · Transportation · Denmark

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Weply is a Danish company specializing in lead generation and customer engagement solutions through 24/7 live chat services. With over 2,400 business clients, Weply positions itself as a trusted partner for businesses across various industries including transportation, automotive, travel, logistics, and advisory sectors. Their key services include trained chat consultants who qualify leads and integrate with CRM systems, enhancing conversion rates significantly. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and relevant content tailored to different business sizes and industries. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern plugins and themes, with integrations for analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Hotjar, and Segment. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. Overall, Weply demonstrates a mature digital presence with good privacy compliance and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 25 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weply.dk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Weply operates a SaaS business model focused on lead generation via live chat, targeting small to medium enterprises and enterprise clients. Their market positioning is strengthened by a broad industry focus and a large client base. The company leverages partnerships across multiple regional domains to expand its reach. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for chat services and integrations. The website content and testimonials indicate strong customer satisfaction and trust. The use of advanced analytics and marketing tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention. Strategic observations include the need to formalize security and incident response policies to enhance trust further.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of cookie consent management via Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. Security headers are likely implemented but not explicitly visible in the HTML content. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Forms are secured with standard WordPress and plugin mechanisms. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response plan, and vulnerability disclosure mechanism represents a compliance gap. The company should consider publishing these documents and implementing a security.txt file to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced with formal documentation and proactive disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page on the website.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and liabilities.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance HTTP security headers and make their presence visible for transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Weply A/S
Registration number
CVR 35414800
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Weply
Description
Weply is powering smarter, simpler and fast lead generation from your current website traffic. All with a human touch.
Key services
24/7 live chat with trained chat consultants, Lead qualification and forwarding, Integration with CRM systems, Industry-specific solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, Fluent Forms, Cookiebot, bb-plugin (Beaver Builder), Astra Theme, Vimeo embed
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and privacy plugins (Cookiebot)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Piwik Pro, Hotjar, Segment
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Hotjar, Segment, Piwik Pro, Calendly, Google AdSense
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Hotjar, Segment, Piwik Pro
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism (Cookiebot) with detailed cookie declarations.
  2. Multiple language versions available via WPML plugin.
  3. Business targets multiple industries and company sizes with tailored solutions.
  4. Strong emphasis on lead generation via live chat with trained consultants.
  5. Use of modern WordPress theme (Astra) and page builder (Beaver Builder).
  6. Integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools for performance and user behavior insights.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and contact forms.
  8. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  9. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Astra theme and Beaver Builder plugin, ensuring flexibility and responsiveness. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, marketing, and lead management, including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Hotjar, Segment, and Piwik Pro. The site loads media-rich content such as videos and images optimized for performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented. The technical infrastructure supports a professional user experience but could benefit from explicit hosting provider identification and performance monitoring to ensure scalability and reliability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weply.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weply.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.