Skip to main content

Security report for wemakespaces.archi

MS Group · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MS Group operates the website 'We Make Spaces - MS Architekti', an established architectural studio based in the Czech Republic since 1990. The company specializes in architectural design, urban planning, and realization of various projects including residential, commercial, and public spaces. The website presents a professional image with a clear focus on their services and portfolio, targeting clients seeking architectural and urban planning expertise. Technically, the site uses a moderate technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO practices but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance concern. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but no detected security headers or explicit security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection and malformed WHOIS response, limiting domain registration transparency. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wemakespaces.archi

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a reputable architectural firm with a long history and a portfolio of diverse projects primarily in the Czech Republic. Their business model revolves around providing architectural and urban planning services to both private and public sector clients. The website's social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn supports brand visibility and client engagement. The absence of detailed contact information and privacy policies suggests areas for improvement in client communication and regulatory compliance. No direct revenue streams or e-commerce functionalities are present, consistent with a service-based professional firm. The firm appears to maintain a medium-sized operation with a focus on quality and professional presentation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, which is essential for secure communications. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No forms or input fields were detected, minimizing attack surface from injection or data leakage vulnerabilities. The use of third-party analytics and tracking tools like Google Analytics and Hotjar introduces privacy considerations, especially given the lack of cookie consent mechanisms. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the site is secure enough for informational purposes but should improve compliance and security controls to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for client and security inquiries.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to inform users about tracking and data collection.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and update libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MS Group
Description
Jsme architektonický ateliér fungující od roku 1990. Znáte nás jako profesionály, kteří navrhují, projektují a realizují jedinečná místa k životu, vitální veřejné prostory, urbanistické koncepty čtvrtí i celých měst.
Key services
Architectural design, Urban planning, Project realization, Public space design, Residential and commercial projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 2.2.4, Slick Carousel, SimpleBar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for an architectural firm.
  2. No visible privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn is evident.
  5. No forms detected on the analyzed page; no data collection fields present.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed response and privacy protection.
  7. Use of common analytics and tracking tools (Google Analytics, Hotjar) without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  8. No security headers information available; HTTPS is used but security headers should be verified.
  9. No vulnerability disclosures or security policies found on the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional technology stack with Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 2.2.4, which are somewhat dated but still functional. The inclusion of Slick Carousel and SimpleBar enhances UI/UX elements. Google Fonts are used for typography. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Hotjar, indicating a focus on user behavior insights. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly, with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 42/100High37 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wemakespaces.archi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wemakespaces.archi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.