Skip to main content

Security report for weglide.org

WeGlide · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WeGlide is a niche community platform dedicated to the gliding sports community, offering services such as flight uploads, story sharing, pilot following, competitions, live tracking, and task planning. The platform targets gliding pilots and enthusiasts, positioning itself as a specialized social and competitive hub within the transportation sector. The website is implemented as a modern Progressive Web App (PWA) using JavaScript and Vue.js frameworks, optimized for mobile devices with good design and navigation clarity. Technical infrastructure includes custom privacy-focused analytics and map rendering technologies, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks explicit security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS registrant data suggests privacy protection, which is typical for community platforms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weglide.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention weglide.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
253
Employees
0
Customers
253
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for weglide.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

WeGlide operates in a specialized market segment serving gliding pilots and enthusiasts, leveraging a community-driven business model that encourages user-generated content and competitive engagement. Its competitive advantage lies in its niche focus and integrated features like live tracking and task planning. Revenue streams are not explicit but may include sponsorships or premium features. The platform maintains a partnership ecosystem including a related magazine subdomain and social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and GitHub. Growth indicators include active feature sets and modern web technologies. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance trust through improved privacy disclosures and contact transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no apparent exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. GDPR compliance indicators are weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of a privacy-focused analytics service is a positive sign. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from enhanced policies, headers, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct accessibility improvements to ensure compliance with standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
WeGlide
Description
Join the gliding community. Upload flights and share stories. Follow other pilots and take part in competitions.
Key services
Flight uploads, Story sharing, Pilot following, Competitions and rankings, Live tracking, Task planning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Web App, Progressive Web App (PWA), MapLibre GL, Custom analytics script
Frameworks
Vue.js (inferred from data-v- attributes)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a modern PWA focused on gliding community engagement.
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the main page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided HTML.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  5. Social media presence includes Facebook, Instagram, and GitHub.
  6. No advertising or third-party ad networks detected.
  7. Custom privacy-focused analytics script used, indicating some privacy awareness.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. WHOIS data is not available, indicating privacy protection or query failure.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built as a modern PWA using Vue.js and JavaScript, with optimized mobile support and good SEO metadata. It uses custom fonts and a privacy-focused analytics script, indicating attention to user privacy. The site preconnects to API and CDN domains for performance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility features. The absence of security headers and formal privacy mechanisms suggests technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a good user experience but requires enhancements to meet higher security and privacy standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weglide.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weglide.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.