Skip to main content

Security report for weezevent.com

Weezevent · Technology · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Weezevent is a well-established technology company founded in 2008, specializing in providing comprehensive event management solutions including ticketing, access control, cashless payment, staff management, and marketing CRM tools. The company serves a broad audience of event organizers ranging from small to large scale events, positioning itself as a trusted platform with over 500,000 organizers and 1 million events using its services. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, consistent branding, and clear messaging tailored to its target market. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a good level of digital maturity and marketing sophistication. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses domain transfer protection, and secures forms with nonce tokens, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts, suggesting room for improvement in security transparency and hardening. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and trustworthy, with moderate user tracking and good compliance with cookie consent requirements, though it lacks visible privacy and terms of service documentation in the provided content. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security and privacy policies, and enhancing security headers to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching weezevent.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Weezevent operates in the event technology sector, offering SaaS solutions that streamline event ticketing, access control, cashless payments, and staff management. Its business model is based on transaction fees and service subscriptions, with a strong emphasis on ease of use and scalability for events of all sizes. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with marketing platforms like HubSpot and analytics tools to enhance customer engagement and retention. The presence of high-profile clients such as Tomorrowland and Boomtown underscores its competitive positioning. Growth indicators include a large user base and continuous platform enhancements. The company maintains a consistent brand image and offers free registration with no commitment, appealing to a wide range of event organizers. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a focus on digital engagement and lead capture via forms.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection in place. The use of nonce tokens in forms indicates attention to input security. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents potential vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact channels limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is implied through cookie consent mechanisms but not explicitly documented. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  4. Add a security policy and incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  6. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  7. Consider adding direct contact information (email, phone) for customer support and sales.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Weezevent
Description
A galaxy of intuitive ticketing, access control, cashless, and staff management services to brilliantly orchestrate your event.
Key services
Online ticketing and registration, Access control solutions, Cashless payment systems, Staff and volunteer management, Marketing and CRM tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, HubSpot analytics and forms, Trustpilot widget, Google Tag Manager, Cookiefirst consent management, Flickity slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with nonce tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, Trustpilot Widget
Marketing tools
HubSpot CRM and forms, Cookiefirst consent management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is relevant and targeted to event organizers.
  3. Multiple external trusted analytics and marketing tools integrated.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via forms.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links detected in provided content.
  6. Domain is well-established with no DNSSEC enabled.
  7. Security headers and policies could be improved.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, and uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, HubSpot analytics and forms, Trustpilot widgets, and Flickity sliders. The site loads with moderate performance and is optimized for mobile devices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The use of multiple external scripts for analytics and marketing indicates a mature digital marketing approach but also increases the attack surface. The site uses a cookie consent banner from Cookiefirst, demonstrating compliance efforts. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and DNSSEC would enhance the overall infrastructure robustness. The site’s design and navigation are clear and professional, supporting a good user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with weezevent.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review weezevent.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.