Skip to main content

Security report for webmaster.com.mx

Tenacis, S.A. de C.V. · Technology · Mexico

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Webmaster.com.mx is a Mexican technology service provider specializing in web hosting, custom web systems, domain registration, and internet consulting. The company, legally known as Tenacis, S.A. de C.V., has been operating since 1995, establishing a strong local presence with over 29 years of experience. Their website reflects a professional business model targeting organizations requiring reliable and high-performance internet solutions. The key services include virtual servers, shared hosting, email hosting, anti-spam filtering, and tailored web design and development. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap 5, Material Kit Pro, FontAwesome, and various JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience and interactivity. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although accessibility features could be improved. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers and does not publish privacy or cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. The WHOIS data is consistent with the website's business claims, reinforcing legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching webmaster.com.mx

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on internet services such as hosting, web design, and domain management. Its long-standing presence since 1995 indicates stability and experience. The business model is service-oriented, catering primarily to businesses and organizations needing reliable internet infrastructure and custom web solutions. The website highlights a comprehensive service portfolio, including virtual servers, shared hosting, email services, and anti-spam filtering, positioning the company as a one-stop provider for internet needs. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests a potential area for compliance improvement. The company maintains clear contact channels and consistent branding, supporting customer trust and engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, which is positive. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Enhancing these areas would improve the overall security maturity and compliance with data protection regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Implement essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance web security.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact channel and vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Improve website accessibility features to broaden user inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tenacis, S.A. de C.V.
Description
En webmaster solucionamos tus necesidades en: diseño de sitios, hospedaje Internet, sistemas web a la medida, estrategia en Internet, consultoría y capacitación.
Key services
Servidor virtual (Virtual servers), Hospedaje compartido (Shared hosting), Hospedaje de correo (Email hosting), Filtrado Anti Spam (Anti-spam filtering), Diseño de sitios web (Web design), Sistemas a la medida (Custom web systems), Nombres de dominio (Domain registration and management), Consultoría y capacitación (Consulting and training)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Material Kit Pro, FontAwesome, Google Fonts (Roboto, Roboto Slab, Material Icons), Typed.js, CountUp.js, Perfect Scrollbar, Anime.js, NoUISlider, Parallax.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap 5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL https://)
  • No inline sensitive data exposure
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and phone.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  5. Website uses modern front-end technologies and good design practices.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-standing business presence.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and well-structured front-end technology stack including Bootstrap 5, Material Kit Pro, and several JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements and animations. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with appropriate meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with no evident technical debt or broken elements. However, the absence of a CMS or backend technology details limits deeper infrastructure analysis. Hosting provider information is not disclosed. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement security best practices to reduce technical risks impacting business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with webmaster.com.mx. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webmaster.com.mx.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.