W.A.G. payment solutions, a.s. · Transportation · Czech Republic
Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.
W.A.G. payment solutions, a.s., operating under the brand Eurowag, is a leading provider of integrated mobility and payment solutions tailored for the European transportation sector. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including fleet management, toll payment solutions, fuel cards, tax refunds, and financial services, targeting commercial fleet operators and logistics companies. Their market position is strong, supported by a large-scale operation and a broad geographic presence across multiple European countries. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, jQuery, and Google Tag Manager, hosted on a performant CDN infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices, accessibility, and SEO, reflecting a mature digital presence. The integration of multiple login portals and partner platforms indicates a complex and well-managed technical ecosystem. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, demonstrating compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, explicit security headers are not visibly configured, and there is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which are areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a large enterprise in the transportation and payment services industry. The lack of WHOIS data reduces transparency but does not detract significantly from the site's legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and formalizing vulnerability disclosure policies to strengthen trust and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention webeye.eu, from OffSeq Breach.
47 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for webeye.eu.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with webeye.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review webeye.eu.