Skip to main content

Security report for web4ce.cz

Web4ce, s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Web4ce, s.r.o. is a Czech-based small technology company specializing in web hosting, web design, server housing, and related internet services. The company offers a range of hosting packages tailored to different customer needs, including email hosting, virtual servers, and comprehensive web design solutions. Their market position appears to be that of a local, established provider with a focus on professional service and customer support. The website content is well-structured and informative, targeting businesses and individuals seeking reliable web hosting and design services. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and custom JavaScript, with a proprietary CMS indicated by script references. The site is moderately optimized for performance and SEO but shows room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. Security-wise, HTTPS is used for administrative login, but no advanced security headers or policies are evident. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. The security posture is moderate, with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but lacking formal security policies or incident response information. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust, although the website content and contact details suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the risk is moderate, with recommendations to improve security headers, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, improving mobile and accessibility features, establishing vulnerability disclosure and incident response protocols, and verifying domain registration details to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching web4ce.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Web4ce, s.r.o. operates in the competitive Czech web hosting and web design market, targeting small to medium businesses and individuals. Their business model is service-oriented, offering tiered hosting packages and custom web design services, generating revenue through subscriptions and project fees. The company maintains a technical support team with clear contact information, enhancing customer trust. The presence of references and an online price calculator indicates a customer-centric approach. However, the lack of visible certifications or compliance statements may limit appeal to larger enterprise clients. Growth potential exists through modernization of technical infrastructure and enhanced compliance measures. Partnerships appear limited to social media presence and client references, with no major strategic alliances identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is implemented for administrative access, but no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are detected. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The security culture appears informal, with no dedicated security contact channels. To improve, the company should adopt formal security frameworks, implement security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and establish incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Establish and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@web4ce.cz).
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Web4ce, s.r.o.
Description
Web4ce, s.r.o. provides webhosting, webdesign, serverhousing, serverhosting, SEO, and content management system services.
Key services
Webhosting, Webdesign, Serverhousing, Serverhosting, SEO, Content Management System
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by login form action URL (https://administrace.web4ce.cz/login.html)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website provides detailed hosting packages and contact info.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  5. Google Analytics is used without visible privacy disclosures.
  6. Site uses legacy browser warnings indicating some outdated tech support.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security features detected.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or proprietary CMS platform with JavaScript libraries including jQuery and various UI components like datepicker and colorpicker. The site structure is clear with multiple CSS stylesheets and JavaScript files for enhanced user experience. Performance is moderate with some legacy support scripts (e.g., IE6 PNG fix). SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. However, mobile optimization and accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses Google Analytics for tracking without visible privacy disclosures. Technical debt is indicated by legacy browser warnings and lack of modern security headers. Modernization opportunities include adopting responsive design, improving accessibility, and enhancing security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with web4ce.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review web4ce.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.