Skip to main content

Security report for web-klub.cz

webklub · Technology · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

65/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

WEB-KLUB.cz is a small Czech Republic-based technology service provider specializing in web design, internet marketing, programming, and web management services. The company presents itself as an experienced agency with a focus on delivering effective internet applications and websites optimized for search engines and marketing. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content targeting businesses seeking digital presence enhancement. Technically, the site uses modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Fonts, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security. Tracking and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are implemented, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA; however, the absence of security headers and privacy/cookie policies suggests room for improvement. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and safe but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching web-klub.cz

This scan found 11 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
20
Average
65

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the competitive web design and internet marketing sector within the Czech Republic, targeting small to medium-sized businesses. Its business model revolves around providing customized web solutions including CMS, e-shops, CRM systems, and ongoing web management services. The presence of multiple named contacts with professional emails and phone numbers supports a credible business operation. The lack of WHOIS data limits verification of domain ownership and age, which is a potential risk factor. The company leverages common marketing and analytics tools to support client campaigns and website performance monitoring. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content. The company appears to have a stable market position with a focus on quality and client responsiveness.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from spam and abuse, which are positive security measures. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The absence of a published privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, and security or incident response policies indicates gaps in compliance and security transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the provided content. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces some privacy considerations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
webklub
Description
Tvoříme internetové aplikace a webové stránky, které přináší výsledky. Díky kvalitní optimalizaci pro vyhledávače (SEO) a promyšlenému internetovému marketingu, jsou naše řešení účinná.
Key services
Webdesign, Internetový marketing, Programování, Správa webu
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for forms
  • Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple company emails and phone numbers.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  6. Website uses modern front-end technologies and includes tracking and marketing scripts.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content; likely need server header analysis for confirmation.
  8. Content is professional, business-focused, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Font Awesome for icons, and Google Fonts for typography. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implemented for spam protection on forms. The site appears to be mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of key scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks explicit security headers which is a technical risk. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 46/100High34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with web-klub.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review web-klub.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.