Skip to main content

Security report for wearelandmark.co.uk

Landmark Branding Ltd · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Landmark Branding Ltd is a UK-based property branding agency specializing in creating distinctive brands for ambitious companies and exciting places, primarily in the real estate sector. Their services focus on creative strategy, branding, and digital knowledge tailored to property developers and corporate clients. The website presents a professional portfolio of projects mainly in Manchester and London, targeting a niche market within property branding. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern technologies including Google Fonts and Vimeo video embeds, delivering fast performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are absent. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable due to a domain registration error indicating the domain name is invalid per Nominet UK rules, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in content but domain registration inconsistencies warrant further verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching wearelandmark.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention wearelandmark.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for wearelandmark.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialist branding agency within the real estate sector, focusing on property branding for commercial and residential projects. Their competitive advantage lies in their creative strategy combined with digital expertise. The business model is service-oriented, targeting property developers and corporate clients in the UK, particularly Manchester and London. The website showcases a portfolio of high-profile projects, indicating established client relationships and market presence. Partnerships such as with the website developer 'We Met Before' suggest a professional ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent project updates and active social media presence. Revenue streams likely derive from branding and digital consultancy services. The company appears small but focused with a clear niche market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. GDPR compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is found. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small agency website but could be improved to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information, ideally via a security.txt file.
  4. Conduct domain registration verification to resolve inconsistencies and ensure domain legitimacy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Landmark Branding Ltd
Description
We create distinctive brands for ambitious companies and exciting places. Experts in property branding, offering creative strategy, distinctive branding, and digital knowledge.
Key services
Creative strategy, Branding, Digital knowledge
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, jQuery 3.5.1, Finsweet Attributes ScrollDisable, Vimeo embeds
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected
  2. Professional design and clear navigation
  3. No forms detected on main page; contact via email and phone only
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to domain registration error
  6. Social media links to LinkedIn and Twitter present
  7. No visible security headers in HTML source
  8. HTTPS enforced with valid SSL
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  10. No explicit GDPR compliance statements beyond privacy policy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Fonts and jQuery 3.5.1. Video content is embedded via Vimeo, enhancing multimedia presentation. The site is hosted on Webflow's infrastructure, providing fast loading times and good mobile responsiveness. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting SEO best practices with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and efficient but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with wearelandmark.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review wearelandmark.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.