Skip to main content

Security report for waterparkstorage.com

Waterpark Storage · Real Estate · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Waterpark Storage operates as a local self storage service provider targeting customers in Cirencester and Swindon. The website presents basic information about storage solutions but lacks comprehensive business and contact details. The technical infrastructure is built on the BaseKit CMS platform with standard web fonts and styling resources hosted externally. While the website is accessible and functional, it lacks advanced security measures such as security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises questions about the domain's registration status and legitimacy, which should be verified to ensure trustworthiness. Overall, the site serves its business purpose but requires improvements in security, privacy, and transparency to enhance credibility and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching waterparkstorage.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
40
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company appears to be a small local business focused on providing self storage units in specific UK locations. The business model is straightforward, relying on rental services for storage space. Market positioning is local and niche, with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. The website content is basic and lacks detailed business information such as founding year, legal entity, or certifications. There is no visible integration with analytics or marketing tools, indicating a limited digital marketing strategy. Growth potential may be constrained without enhanced online presence and trust signals.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. HTTPS status is unknown from the provided data, and no security headers were detected. There is no evidence of secure forms or vulnerability disclosures. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. These gaps expose the business to potential risks including data breaches, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. Immediate actions should include implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, and establishing privacy and cookie policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and ensure all resources load securely.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
  5. Verify domain registration status and update WHOIS information to enhance legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Waterpark Storage
Description
Discover the perfect solution for your Waterpark storage needs in Cirencester & Swindon. Find out about our storage Cirencester services today.
Key services
Self storage units, Storage solutions in Cirencester, Storage solutions in Swindon
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
BaseKit, FontAwesome, PhotoSwipe, Google Fonts (Playfair Display, Rubik)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content loaded.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Website uses BaseKit CMS and resources hosted on prositehosting.co.uk.
  6. No security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Content is focused on local self storage services in Cirencester and Swindon.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses BaseKit CMS with external CSS and font resources loaded from prositehosting.co.uk and Google Fonts. The design is basic with moderate performance and mobile optimization. No advanced frameworks or analytics tools were detected. The site lacks accessibility features and SEO optimization is minimal. Hosting appears to be via a third-party provider associated with the CMS. There is opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance SEO and accessibility compliance to improve user experience and search visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with waterparkstorage.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review waterparkstorage.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.