Skip to main content

Security report for washanddrive.lv

SIA "Wash and Drive" · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Wash and Drive is a Latvian company operating a network of self-service and automated express car wash stations across multiple cities including Riga and Liepāja. The business focuses on providing quick, affordable, and convenient car washing services using recognized technologies such as Kärcher and Coleman Hanna. Their market position is that of an established regional service provider with a modern approach to car washing, including automated conveyor washing lines and vacuum zones for interior cleaning. Technically, the website is built on a modern web stack likely involving Ruby on Rails, Bootstrap, and Turbolinks, with embedded multimedia content and social media integration. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience, though some SEO and accessibility improvements are possible. The presence of Facebook Pixel indicates moderate user tracking. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and CSRF tokens but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism but no clear privacy policy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and credible for its business purpose but would benefit from enhanced security practices, clearer privacy documentation, and improved compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching washanddrive.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Wash and Drive operates in the transportation sector, specifically in car washing services. Their business model includes self-service stations and an innovative automated express washing line, targeting individual car owners and businesses in Latvia. The company leverages partnerships with technology providers like Kärcher and Coleman Hanna to differentiate its service quality. Customer testimonials and multiple locations indicate a stable market presence and customer trust. The company appears medium-sized with a focus on regional expansion and customer convenience. The website supports their business model with clear service descriptions and contact channels but lacks detailed corporate information such as founding year or parent company data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and CSRF protection in place. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which could hinder security incident management. The absence of a privacy policy and limited GDPR compliance indicators suggest compliance gaps. The use of Facebook Pixel introduces moderate user tracking, which should be transparently disclosed. Overall, the security maturity is average with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet recognized standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.
  5. Review and disclose data collection and retention policies related to tracking technologies like Facebook Pixel.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Wash and Drive"
Description
WASH & DRIVE offers self-service car washes and an automated express car wash line in Latvia, providing quick, convenient, and affordable car cleaning services across multiple cities including Riga and Liepāja.
Key services
Self-service car wash, Automated express car wash line, Vacuum cleaner zones for interior cleaning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Facebook Pixel, YouTube embedded videos
Frameworks
Bootstrap (navbar classes), Turbolinks
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of CSRF tokens in meta tags
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and includes embedded videos and social media integration.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with company email and phone number.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with a link to a cookie policy PDF.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  8. Use of Facebook Pixel indicates moderate user tracking.
  9. Website is primarily in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  10. Business appears legitimate with consistent branding and customer testimonials.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Ruby on Rails (inferred), Bootstrap for responsive design, and Turbolinks for page navigation speed. It integrates third-party services such as Facebook Pixel for analytics and YouTube for video content. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and layouts. Performance appears moderate with no obvious broken elements. However, SEO could be improved by adding structured data (JSON-LD) and more comprehensive meta tags. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. The technical setup supports the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and SEO improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with washanddrive.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review washanddrive.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.