Skip to main content

Security report for vyklizeni-kutna-hora.cz

Vyklízení a bourací práce Kutná Hora, Čáslav · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vyklízení a bourací práce Kutná Hora, Čáslav is a small local service provider specializing in property clearance and demolition services in the Kutná Hora and Čáslav regions of the Czech Republic. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including clearing residential and commercial properties, ecological waste disposal, and demolition of small to medium-sized structures. Their market position is focused on local customers, including households, businesses, and public institutions, with a strong emphasis on professional and environmentally responsible service delivery. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies such as jQuery, Facebook SDK, and custom JavaScript for form validation. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and clear navigation, although no CMS or hosting provider details are evident. The website includes GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms and a privacy policy, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements client-side form validation and cookie consent. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers or published security policies and incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but improvements in security headers and server-side validation are recommended. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image consistent with a legitimate small business. The lack of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is common and does not detract from the site's credibility. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security posture with headers and policies, publishing incident response information, and maintaining up-to-date technical components.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vyklizeni-kutna-hora.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the real estate services sector, specifically focusing on property clearance and demolition. Its competitive advantage lies in local expertise, ecological waste handling, and flexible service offerings including weekend and holiday work. Revenue streams are primarily service fees based on hourly rates and equipment usage. The target customer segments include private homeowners, estate executors, businesses, and public institutions within the Kutná Hora and Čáslav areas. Growth indicators include multiple related partner sites and a visible customer review. The partnership ecosystem includes sister sites in nearby regions and related service businesses. Operationally, the company maintains a straightforward business model with direct customer engagement via phone, email, and online forms.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Client-side validation is implemented for forms, but there is no evidence of server-side validation or anti-CSRF protections. Security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing a potential area of improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices are basic but compliant with GDPR. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add server-side validation and anti-CSRF tokens to all forms to prevent injection and forgery attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update all third-party libraries and scripts to their latest secure versions.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing a dedicated data protection officer contact.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Radek Hutla
Registration number
16239849
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Vyklízení a bourací práce Kutná Hora, Čáslav
Description
Provádíme vyklízení nemovitostí a bourací práce v Kutné Hoře, Čáslavi a širokém okolí. Vyklidíme byt, dům, úřad, firmu nebo třeba jenom sklep. Odpad ekologicky zlikvidujeme. Provádíme také bourací práce.
Key services
Property clearance (byty, domy, sklepy, garáže, kanceláře, firmy), Demolition and dismantling works, Waste removal and ecological disposal, Clearance of estates and land, Small and large demolition including asbestos material handling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, Facebook SDK, Lightbox JS, Custom JavaScript for form validation, CSS stylesheets
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URLs)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Form validation scripts present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook share button, Twitter share button
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy-protected, common for small businesses.
  3. Clear GDPR and cookie consent compliance present.
  4. Contact information is comprehensive and consistent across multiple sections.
  5. Business is a local service provider specializing in property clearance and demolition in Czech Republic.
  6. Website uses standard web technologies and includes social media integration.
  7. No security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No terms of service page found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including jQuery 3.3.1, Facebook SDK, and custom JavaScript for form validation. CSS is modularized into multiple stylesheets for layout, menu, content, forms, and utilities. The site loads external scripts asynchronously to improve performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive meta tags and adaptive menus. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD for local business schema. No CMS or hosting provider is identified, suggesting a custom or static site deployment. Performance is moderate with room for optimization in script loading and caching. Accessibility is basic with labeled form fields but could be improved with ARIA roles and keyboard navigation enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vyklizeni-kutna-hora.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vyklizeni-kutna-hora.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.