Skip to main content

Security report for vstavaneskrine.com

ROLKOM, s.r.o. · Real Estate · Slovakia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ROLKOM, s.r.o. is a Slovakian small business specializing in custom built-in wardrobes (vstavané skrine) and related home improvement products such as security doors, interior doors, plastic windows, flooring, and custom kitchens. The company targets residential customers primarily in Bratislava and surrounding areas, offering personalized service with a 5-year warranty and online planning tools. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and WooCommerce, featuring good SEO and user experience. Technical infrastructure includes modern plugins and analytics tools, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional business presence with room for improvement in security and domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of vstavaneskrine.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching vstavaneskrine.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ROLKOM operates in the real estate and home improvement sector, focusing on custom furniture and renovation services. Their business model combines direct B2C sales with online configurators and a physical showroom. The company has a strong local market position with over 18 years of experience, leveraging customer testimonials and warranty offers as trust signals. Partnerships include web development services from digitalgarden.sk. The company maintains GDPR compliance and provides clear contact information, enhancing credibility. Growth potential lies in expanding online configurator usage and improving digital marketing. No evidence of complex partnerships or subsidiaries was found.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency in security management. The website does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries visibly. Recommendations include adding security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and enhancing form security to prevent spam and abuse. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be improved to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a detailed security and privacy policy page outlining data protection practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain compatibility.
  5. Enhance form security with CAPTCHA or other anti-spam measures to protect against automated abuse.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ROLKOM, s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ROLKOM, s.r.o.
Description
Vstavané skrine na mieru, bezpečnostné dvere, interiérové dvere, plastové okná, podlahy a kuchyne na mieru. Firma Rolkom s.r.o. ponúka kvalitné a cenovo dostupné riešenia s 5 ročnou zárukou a osobným prístupom v Bratislave a okolí.
Key services
Custom built-in wardrobes (vstavané skrine), Security doors, Interior doors, Plastic windows, Flooring and parquet, Custom kitchens, Apartment renovations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, WooCommerce 3.9.5, Slider Revolution 6.6.20, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookie Consent plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Uses modern WordPress CMS with common plugins and SEO tools
  3. Provides clear contact information and business details
  4. Includes cookie consent and GDPR compliance documents
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  6. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trustworthiness from domain registration perspective
  7. No adult or questionable content detected
  8. Good SEO and user experience with clear navigation and structured data
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.2 with WooCommerce 3.9.5, using Slider Revolution for visual content and Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The tech stack is modern and widely supported, ensuring good compatibility and extensibility. Performance is moderate, with some optimization opportunities in caching and asset loading. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and keyboard navigation enhancements. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, limiting infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation supports business goals effectively with room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with vstavaneskrine.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review vstavaneskrine.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.